DeVry nr361 all assignment

DeVry nr361 all assignment

DeVry_nr361_all_assignment_latest_2017_october.zip (1639.59 KB)

Week 2 Patient Guide

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on DeVry nr361 all assignment  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Patient Education
Technology

Purpose

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on DeVry nr361 all assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills
of the professional nurse as an educator. You are to prepare a guide that will
serve as a handout to assist a specific patient that you identify. Your guide
or handout should help this patient find and evaluate a reliable mobile health,
or mHealth application (app) that is already developed. This may be related to
his or her disease process or diagnosis, or may be an app that can help a
patient maintain or improve good health, and prevent illness.

You will develop the guide using Microsoft PowerPoint.
PowerPoint is a versatile application that lets you design slideshows and
handouts. For this assignment, you will be using PowerPoint to create a guide
or handout that you may print and give to patients and families. You will be
submitting this PowerPoint file for grading.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following
Course Outcome.

CO#1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to
address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO#1)

CO#5: Identify patient care technologies, information
systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO#5)

Points

This assignment is worth a total of 175 points.

Due Date

The Patient Education Technology Guide to a Mobile Health
Application PowerPoint assignment is due at the end of Week 2. Submit your
completed assignment by Sunday; 11:59 p.m. MT. You may consult the Policies,
under the Instruction & Resources Module, for details regarding late
assignments. Late assignments will result in loss of points. Post questions
about this assignment in the Q & A discussion.

Directions

Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create slides, which will be the
basis of the guide or handout. You are required to cite your source(s) as it
relates to your application slide. Other citations are permitted, but this is
not a requirement for the assignment.

Title slide (first slide): Include a title slide with your
name and title of the presentation.

Scenario Slide (one slide): This slide should include a
brief scenario, then identify a patient who is experiencing a specific disease process
or diagnosis who would benefit from an already developed and reliable mHealth
app. Or, identify a person is currently healthy and would like to maintain or
improve health and prevent illness. Be sure to include the nurse’s assessment
of the patient’s learning needs and readiness to learn. Be specific.

Example:

Scenario for Ms. Ellis

Jane Doe (your name here)

Jennifer Ellis, a 62-year-old African American who has been
recently diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD). She has been prescribed several
medications she must take every day.

The nephrologist has stressed the importance of leading a
healthy life style to slow or stop the progression of CKD.

She is interested in ways in which she can better track her
health and make healthier choices.

She is a high school graduate and iPhone user, mostly to
send text messages to family and friends.

She is eager to learn how to use an app that can help her
manager her CKD.

Prepare the following slides as if you are presenting them
to the patient.

mHealth Application Slide (one to three slides): Identify a
developed and reliable mHealth app that could benefit the patient. Describe the
app including its:

Name

Purpose

Intended audience

Mobile device(s) upon which it will operate

Where to download or obtain it. Include a working link if it
is to be downloaded from a website.

And any other information you believe would be pertinent to
this situation.

Sources that are used are cited.

Teaching Slides (one to three slides): Prepare slides that
contain important points about the app that you want to teach to the patient
such as: how to use the app safely and effectively including how to interpret
and act on the information that is provided.

Evaluation Slide (one to three slides): Describe how you
would determine the success of the patient’s use of this app. For example,
include ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that are a good
fit for the type of app or focus on specific ways that this app benefits the
patient’s health and wellness.

References (last slide): List any references for sources
that were used or cited in the presentation.

Writing and Design: There should be no spelling or
grammatical errors. Writing is concise and clear. Avoid words that the patient
may not understand. Slides are visually appealing incorporating graphics,
photographs, colors, and themes.

Review the section on Academic Integrity Policy found in the
RNBSN Policies. All work must be original (in your own words) unless properly
cited.

Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Slideshows

Be creative, but realistic.

Incorporate graphics, color, themes, or photographs to
increase interest.

Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.

Review directions thoroughly.

Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as
well as on the Reference slide.

Proofread prior to final submission.

Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final
submission.

Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.

Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a
PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be
helpful. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx
(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. The Chamberlain Student
Success Strategies (CCSSS) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a
section on PowerPoint. The link to SSP CCSSS may be found in your student
portal.

Week 4: Information
Systems Paper

Information Systems
in Healthcare Paper

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to select a topic related
to information systems in healthcare from the list provided, research and
analyze the topic, and describe how you will apply your newfound knowledge to
your nursing practice.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet one or more of
the following Course Outcomes depending upon the topic selected:

CO#1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to
address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO#1)

CO#2: Analyze data from all relevant sources, including
technology, to inform the delivery of care. (PO#2)

CO#3: Define standardized terminology that reflects
nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO#3)

CO#4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support
tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support
a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO#4)

CO#5: Identify patient care technologies, information
systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO#5)

CO#6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional
ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory
requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO#6)

CO#7: Examine the use of information systems to document
interventions related to achieving nurse sensitive outcomes. (PO#7)

CO#8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force
to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO#8)

Due Date

Your completed paper is due at the end of Week 4. Submit by
Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Post your questions to the Q & A Forum. Contact
your instructor if you need additional assistance. See the Course Policies
regarding late assignments and academic integrity. Failure to submit your paper
on time will result in a deduction of points.

Rubric

Click to download the NR361 Information Systems Paper Rubric
(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Topics

Select ONE of these topics for the focus of your paper:

Standard terminologies (CO3, CO8)

Decision-making support tools (CO4, CO8)

Patient education technology (CO5, CO8)

Data integrity, legal and ethical implications (CO7, CO8)

Directions

You are to research, analyze, and write an APA-formatted
scholarly paper about the topic that you have selected.

Write an introduction that defines and describes the topic.
Address what purpose the topic serves and how it impacts the delivery of
healthcare in general, and nursing care in particular. Keep in mind that APA
guidelines state you are not to use the heading of “Introduction,”
but you should include it at the beginning of your paper.

Search for scholarly sources and relevant websites. Include
a minimum of two scholarly sources. The course textbook does not qualify as a
scholarly source. Cite all sources in the body of the paper and include them in
the References list following proper APA formatting.

Provide one example of this topic. Describe the main
features or aspects of the example with support from your sources.

Describe an experience where the topic impacted you personally,
either when you were receiving health care, or when you were providing nursing
care. Relate one positive aspect or one negative aspect of this experience and
how it could have been improved.

Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, purpose and how
your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.

Use Microsoft Word to develop your paper. Use APA
formatting. Refer to the Publication manual of the APA, 6th edition. Review the
various APA documents included in this course and the Chamberlain Care Student
Success Strategies (CCSSS) that can help you with your writing. Take advantage
of the tutoring services that are available to Chamberlain students for free.

The length of the paper should be a maximum of 4-5 pages,
excluding the title page and the reference page. There should only be one small
quote maximum in the paper. Citations should primarily include summary and
restatement.

Week 6: Interview
with a Nurse Information Expert

Interview with a
Nursing Information Expert

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to:

communicate your understanding of the importance of quality
information in everyday nursing practice;

discuss the roles and responsibilities of a Nursing
Information Expert; and

articulate how the professional nurse uses information/data
in every day practice to improve outcomes.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following
Course Outcomes.

CO#1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to
address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO#1)

CO#4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support
tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support
a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers.

CO#8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force
to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO#8)

Points

This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.

Due Date

This assignment, Interview with a Nursing Information
Expert, is due at the end of Week 6. Submit your completed Interview, using the
Interview Form, by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Post questions to the Q & A
Forum. Contact your instructor if you need additional assistance. See the
Policies regarding late assignments. Failure to submit your paper on time will
result in a deduction of points.

Directions

Download the NR361 Interview Form (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site., which will be used to complete this
assignment.

Select your interviewee and schedule an interview. This
individual must be a Registered Nurse. Job titles of RNs who may be considered
include, but are not limited to, Nursing Clinical Information Manager; Super
User, Director/Manger Clinical Education; Chief Information Officer; Quality
Assurance or Performance Improvement Nurse; Nurse Informaticist; Telenursing
Specialist; Nurse Abstractor; Case Manager; Compliance Nurse. If you have any
concerns about whether the RN is suitable for this assignment, contact your
instructor BEFORE you schedule the interview.

Review all questions (areas of inquiry) on the Interview
Form PRIOR to conducting the interview. You may print the form and take it with
you to the interview.

Note there are five required questions to ask the RN.

Note there are four optional questions. You need to select
only one of these to ask the RN.

Note there are two follow-up questions that must be answered
by you.

Prior to conducting your interview, review two scholarly
resources. These resources should guide your understanding of the RN’s role and
responsibilities or make you more knowledgeable about GIGO, Interprofessional
Communication, or other key concepts in the questions that you may not fully
understand. For example, if your interviewee is a telenurse, you would want to
review information on this specialty. If you do not know what GIGO means, look
it up.

Conduct your interview. The length of your interview will
vary but should not exceed one hour.

Submit the completed interview form prior to the deadline
outlined above.

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) 375 37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) 200 20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5) 200 20%
Executive Summary (Week 7) 225 22.5%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)