Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment
Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment
NURS 8410 Assignment: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment
Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment
Disseminating EBP Assignments
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Many factors influence how successfully an EBP Assignment is implemented and evaluated. As noted in this week’s Learning Resources, using a translation framework can facilitate effective implementation and the evaluation of outcomes.
For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience. The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report, poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable.
To prepare for this week’s section of Application 5:
- Reflect on the definitions and criteria for scholarship presented in the Learning Resources and in your weekly discussions.
- Consider AACN’s definition of scholarship and their vision of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in furthering nursing scholarship.
The full Application 5 is due by Day 7 of this week. Instructions for how to prepare for previous sections of this Application have been provided in Weeks 9 and 10
To complete:
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Assignment 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment
For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience. The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report, poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable, Your scholarly product must include the following:
- Background, Purpose, and Nature of the Project (2 points)
Describe the larger problem or issue you explored in your DNP Project. Identify your practice-focused question. Explain how this problem or issue affects nursing practice and the overall health care system, and describe how your DNP Project explored possible strategies for addressing the problem or issue. - Evidence (2 points)
Identify the practice setting and context in which you conducted your project, a summary of the evidence supporting the project, and the process for implementation and evaluation.
- Presentation of Results (2 points)
Explain the results of your DNP Project and recommendations for change that you made to the organization.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 11 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 11 Assignment
Practicum: Journal and Time Log
By Day 7
You will submit a journal entry (along with your time log) for Weeks 8-11. Journal entries need to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. Your journal entry should be week-based and sequential so that all journal entries are contained in one file.
- Describe the observed activity
- Using an evidence-based approach, analyze the problem, issue, or situation. Address questions posed in the weekly practicum pages if appropriate.
- Reveal how the real-world might mirror or diverge from program-related evidence, concepts, and/or theories.
- Time Log submission
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Practicum for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Practicum+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 11 Practicum link.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Practicum+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
To access your rubric:
Week 11 Practicum Rubric
Check Your Practicum Draft for Authenticity
To check your Practicum draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 11 Practicum draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Practicum by Day 7
To submit your Practicum:
Week 11 Practicum
Week in Review
In this final week you analyzed the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship and assessed the practicum experience.
Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.
NURS 8410 Week 11: Dissemination, Part I
One of the chief purposes of translating evidence into practice is to advance the field of nursing. Dissemination is a critical step in this process.
It is important to disseminate and share the information gained from a translation-of-evidence project to enhance the body of knowledge within the profession, thus furthering the science of nursing. Yet how does one prepare to disseminate research findings? What is required to engage in this form of scholarship?
This week, you assess the role of dissemination in scholarship. You also complete your practicum experience and submit your time log and final journal entry.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship
- Assess the practicum experience
Photo Credit: [Blend_ImagesCLOSE]/[Blend Images]/Getty Images
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S. & Terhan, M.F. (2016). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Springer.
- Chapter 18, Dissemination of Evidence
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1999). Defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/defining-scholarship
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPEssentials.pdf
Boyer, E. L. (1992). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Issues in Accounting Education, 7(1), 87-91.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Carina, K., Chan, Y., Oldenburg, B., & Kasisomayajula, V. (2015). Advancing the science of dissemination and implementation in behavioral medicine: Evidence and progress. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 277-282 doi 10.1007/s12529-015-9490-2
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877-880. Retrieved from http://www.academicpeds.org/events/assets/Glassick article.pdf
Lane, J.P. & Stone, V.J. (2015). Comparing three knowledge communication strategies – diffusion, dissemination and translation – through randomized controlled studies. Assistive Technology doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-566-1-92
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Leeman, J., Myers, A.E.,Ribisl, K.M.,& Ammerman, A.S. (2015). Disseminating policy and environmental change interventions: Insights from obesity prevention and tobacco control. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22:301–311 doi 10.1007/s12529-014-9427-1
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Rieger, K. & Schultz, A.S. (2014). Exploring arts-based knowledge translation: Sharing research findings through performing the patterns, rehearsing the results, staging the synthesis. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(2), 133–139.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Tricco, a.C., Ashoor, H.M., Cardoso, R., MacDonald, H., Cogo, E., Kastner, M., Perrier, L., McKibbon, A., Grimshaw, J.M. & Straus, S.E. (2016). Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision making: a scoping review. Implementation Science, 11(55) doi 10.1186/s13012-016-0421-7
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.