Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Question Description Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Need help with my Nursing question – I’m studying for my class.

Review “An Integrated Ethical-Decision-Making Model for Nurses” from this week’s University Library Readings. Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

https://search.proquest.com/docview/919532335/fulltextPDF/1397E8419523405DPQ/1?accountid=35812 Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Apply the ethical decision-making model in the article to access to care or an ethical issue of your choice.

Note: If you have questions about your chosen topic, contact your faculty member to ensure it is appropriate. Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Follow the steps provided in the model, including the following. Label each of these six steps:

1. State the ethical issue (using two conflicting ethical principles) and its relevance for nursing practice. Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

2. Collect and analyze additional information:

What populations does this serve? Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Who are the key stakeholders?

What information is needed to overcome the problem?

After looking at additional information, decide whether the initial problem was correctly stated.

3. Develop alternatives and compare them:

What alternative programs address the issues? Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

4. Justify the decision:

Explain why this is important, needed, or beneficial for vulnerable populations.

5. Find strategies to implement the plan:

What ethical arguments could you use to dissuade someone who disagrees with the program?

6. Evaluate Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

Format your assignment as one of the following:

15- to 20-slide presentation with slide titles for key points (preferred for this assignment)

Cite at least 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years to support your position(s).

Include an APA-formatted reference list.

Instructor Tips:

Week 3 Clarification For Assignment

Hello everyone!

Here’s another assignment for which I may have some good tips for you — to make it easier for you to get it written. BE SURE TO LOOK at the Grading Rubric before you start.

The topic for this week’s assignment is “Applying an Ethical Decision-Making Model.” Assignment: Breach of Patient Confidentiality or Right to Privacy PPT

· If you want to do this for access to care, choose a vulnerable population (such as the elderly, diabetics, uninsured, rural health, etc) and draft an ethical statement about that population’s access to care. Use something like, “There needs to be a better way to access care for _____ (…because they don’t have the same access as others).” Remember that an ethical dilemma needs to include at least two ethical principles in conflict, for example, there may be a conflict between justice vs beneficence, or non-maleficence vs autonomy. Then label and apply each step of the model in the Park’s article to your vulnerable population.

· If you want to do this for another ethical issue of your choice, be sure you think about how to state the ethical dilemma with at least two conflicting ethical principles. That’s what makes it a “dilemma.”

There is an example at the end of the Park article that might be helpful for you to see how to go through each of the 6 steps. Be sure that you label and cover at least the first 5 steps in Park’s decision-making model. Step 6 is to Evaluate the outcomes, and this may or may not be applicable to your ethical dilemma, so it is optional. These can be short statements for each step.

Please label each of your six steps in the Park decision-making model so I can see that you’ve covered all of them. Also, be sure you cover each of the four bullet points for “Analyzes additional information” on the Grading Guidelines.

I hope this is helpful!

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.