Assignment: Journal of Critical Care

Assignment: Journal of Critical Care

Assignment: Journal of Critical Care

Assignment: Journal of Critical Care

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT : Assignment: Journal of Critical Care

Question Description
This article must be used prior to answering the assigned questions. They would like paraphrasing and citation instead of quotations. You are able to use outside sources to support information if needed. Attached is the assigned worksheet- you must use this worksheet. If you do not find this worksheet, please let me know

de Araujo, D. D., Silva, D. V. A., Rodrigues, C. A. O., Silva, P. O., Macieira, T. G. R., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2019). Effectiveness of nursing interventions to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 299–306. Retrieved from https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137294247&site=eds-live&scope=site

Criteria Below:

Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the Study _5702Using information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >26.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

blank
Edit ratingDelete rating

26.0 to >24.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

_191
Edit ratingDelete rating

24.0 to >11.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

_7302
Edit ratingDelete rating

11.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.

_9652
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 30.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

_883
Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >16.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

_9934
Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >8.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

_2464
Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

_9162
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

_4506
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample_3313Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

_8840
Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >16.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

_869
Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >8.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

_7357
Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

_5763
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

_6259
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection _9951Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

_5636
Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >16.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details

_2515
Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >8.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

_8093
Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

_2524
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

_9194
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis _9023Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

_9363
Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >16.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

_9735
Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >8.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

_7303
Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

_7315
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

_4681
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations_2921Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

_6712
Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >16.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

_2046
Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >8.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

_8116
Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

_5338
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

_8624
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/Discussion117424_1481Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

117424_4146
Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >16.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

117424_2670
Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >8.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

117424_1038
Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

117424_8754
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

117424_6380
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research Literature117424_3884Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >26.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

117424_2304
Edit ratingDelete rating

26.0 to >24.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

117424_1468
Edit ratingDelete rating

24.0 to >11.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

117424_3803
Edit ratingDelete rating

11.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

117424_7610
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.

117424_4649
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 30.0 pts

Assignment: Journal of Critical Care

Assignment: Journal of Critical Care
—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar 117424_8266

 

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >6.0 ptsExcellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.

117424_5415
Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 ptsGood writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.

117424_3142
Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 ptsFair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.

117424_6503
Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >0.0 ptsPoor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.

117424_5001
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsVery poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.

117424_7623
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts

/ 10.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences 117424_6088

 

Range

threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >5.0 ptsExcellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.

117424_6846
Edit ratingDelete rating

5.0 to >4.0 ptsGood APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.

117424_289
Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 ptsFair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.

117424_7886
Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >0.0 ptsPoor APA formatting with many errors noted.

117424_3971
Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 ptsVery poor APA with errors noted throughout.

117424_7226
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

• Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
• Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
• One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
• I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

• Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
• In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
• Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
• Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

• Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
• Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
• I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6^th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

• I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
• As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
• It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

 

LopesWrite Policy

• For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
• Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
• Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
• Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

• The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
• Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
• If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
• I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
• As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

• Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
  • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
  • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.