Assignment: Learning Experience.
Assignment: Learning Experience.
Assignment: Learning Experience.
Assignment: Learning Experience.
Assignment: Learning Experience.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPERASSIGNMENT:Assignment: Learning Experience.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Assignment: Learning Experience. completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
26 Part 1: An Overview of Business Ethics
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Assignment: Learning Experience. done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
ENDNOTES
1. Guido Palazzo, Franciska Krings, and Ulrich Hoffrage, “Ethical Blindess,” Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2012), 323–338.
2. Kayla Webley, “Cheating Harvard,” Time , September 17, 2012, 22.
3. Teressa L. Elliot, Linda M. Marquis, and Catherine S. Neal, “Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud,” Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2013), 91–99.
4. United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), Accessed 2.5.13 http://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf .
5. Wroe Alderson, Dynamic Marketing Behavior (Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1965), 320.
6. Tom Polansek, “Peregrine Financial ex-CEO expects life of fraud to end in jail,” Reuters , January 30, 2013, http:// www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/30/us-peregrine- financial-fate-idUSBRE90T1BL20130130 (accessed January 30, 2013).
7. Ethics Resource Center, 2011 National Business Ethics Survey (Arlington, VA: Ethics Resource Center, 2012), 22–23.
8. Dan Fitzpatrick and Robin Sidel, “New J.P. Morgan Jam,” The Wall Street Journal , November 16, 2012, C1–C2.
9. Edelman, Global Deck: 2013 Trust Barometer , http:// www.edelman.com/trust-downloads/global-results-2/ (accessed January 30, 3013).
10. Leonidas C. Leonidou, Olga Kvasova, Constantinos N. Leonidou, and Simo Chari, “Business Unethicality as an Impediment to Consumer Trust: The Moderating Role of Demographic and Cultural Characteristics,” Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2013): 397–415.
11. Daniel Gilbert, “Chesapeake CEO McClendon to Exit,” The Wall Street Journal , January 29, 2013, http://online. wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324329204578272 353396167988.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews (accessed January 30, 2013).
12. Christopher Helman, “McClendon Out At Chesapeake-Is a Takeover Next?” Forbes , January 29, 2013, http:// www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2013/01/29/ aubrey-mcclendon-out-at-chesapeake-energy/ (accessed March 25, 2013).
13. Chris Helms,“Jamaica Plain Neighborhood Council Rejects Whole Foods Seating Proposal,” Jamaica Plain Patch , April 25, 2012, http://jamaicaplain.patch.com/ articles/jamaica-plain-neighborhood-council-rejects- whole-foods-seating-proposal (accessed February 1, 2013); John Ruch, “JP prof to head Whole Foods study,” Jamaica Plain Gazette , April 27, 2012, http://jamaicaplaingazette.com/2012/04/27/jp-prof-to- head-whole-foods-study/ (accessed February 1, 2013).
14. The Associated Press, “Rod Blagojevich, convicted on corruption charges, begins serving 14-year prison sentence in Colorado,” New York Daily News , http:// www.nydailynews.com/news/national/rod-blagojevich- convicted-corruption-charges-begins-serving-14-year- prison-sentence-colorado-article-1.1040164 (accessed February 1, 2013).
15. Julian E. Barnes and James Hookway, “Military Ethics Review Is Ordered,” The Wall Street Journal , November 16, 2012, A6.
16. Reed Albergotti, Vanessa O’Connell, and Suzanne Vranica, “Armstrong Gets Dumped,” The Wall Street Journal , October 18, 2012, B1.
17. Ken Belson, “Concussion Liability Costs May Rise, and Not Just for N.F.L.,” The New York Times , December 10, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/sports/ football/insurance-liability-in-nfl-concussion-suits-may- have-costly-consequences.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (accessed February 1, 2013).
18. Tim De Bock, Iris Vermeir, and Patrick Van Kenhove, “‘What’s the Harm in Being Unethical? These Strangers are Rich Anyway!’ Exploring Underlying Factors of Double Standards,” Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2013), 225–240.
19. Brent Kendall, “High Court Rules in Favor of Book Reseller,” The Wall Street Journal , March 19, 2013, http:// online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324323904578 370263406999592.html (accessed March 25, 2013); Brent Kendall and Wilawan Watcharasakwet, “High Court Dives into Resale Trade,” October 29, 2012, The Wall Street Journal , http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424 052970204789304578084730729110360.html (accessed March 25, 2013).
20. Ann Zimmerman, “Judge Refuses to Block Zale Diamond Ads,” The Wall Street Journal , January 24, 2013, http:// online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732453930457 8262202669342698.html?KEYWORDS=zales (accessed February 1, 2013).
21. Frank Chapman Sharp and Philip G. Fox, Business Ethics (New York, NY: D. Appleton-Century Company Incorporated, 1937).
22. Archie B. Carroll and Ann K. Buchholtz, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (Cincinnati: South-Western, 2006), 452–455.
23. R. Edward Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman, 1984).
24. Alan R. Yuspeh, “Development of Corporate Compliance Programs: Lessons Learned from the DII Experience,” in Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizenship” Corporation (Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission, 1995), 71–79.
25. Eleanor Hill, “Coordinating Enforcement Under the Department of Defense Voluntary Disclosure Program,” in Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizenship” Corporation (Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission, 1995), 287–294.
26. “Huffing and Puffing in Washington: Can Clinton’s Plan Curb Teen Smoking?” Consumer Reports 60 (1995): 637.
27. Arthur Levitt with Paula Dwyer, Take on the Street (New York: Pantheon Books, 2002).
28. Hill, “Coordinating Enforcement.” 29. Richard P. Conaboy, “Corporate Crime in America:
Strengthening the Good Citizen Corporation,” in Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizenship” Corporation (Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission, 1995), 1–2.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
- The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
- Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
- Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
- One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
- I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
- Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
- In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
- Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
- Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
- Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
- Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
- I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
- I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
- As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
- It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
- For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
- Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
- Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
- Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
- The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
- Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
- If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
- I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
- As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
- Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
- Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
- Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.