Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Assignment NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

The SOAP note’s 65-year-old Black American male patient arrives at the emergency room complaining of sporadic epigastric stomach ache that radiates to his back. When he went to the neighboring urgent care facility, PPIs were provided to him without providing any relief. The patient reported that the pain had been worse over the preceding few hours and he had vomited the afternoon when he finally went to the emergency department. He hasn’t had a fever, diarrhea, or any other signs often associated with stomach discomfort. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to evaluate the offered subjective and objective data to determine the patient’s primary and differential diagnoses.

Subjective Portion

According to the OLDCARTS technique, the HPI lacks information on the kind, intensity, and aggravating and alleviating elements of the pain. In addition, there is no information on the color or consistency of vomit (Ball et al., 2019).The date of the HTN diagnosis and if the illness has been treated are missing from the PMH. This section ID also lacks information on previous hospitalizations and surgical histories. The dosage and frequency of metoprolol are not listed in the medication section. The allergy section does not address allergies to food, the environment, or latex.

A family history should include information on all first-degree relatives, including parents, grandparents, siblings, and their children. Add details on the person’s age, whether they’re living or deceased, and how they’re feeling. Any dead relatives’ age and method of death should also be mentioned. Age and any ailments should be mentioned if the person is still alive. It should also include a list of mental health issues including depression, addiction, and substance misuse.

Owing to the patient’s digestive issues, a comprehensive series of subjective GI system questions should be made, including Has the digestive illness continued for a considerable amount of time? Burning in the substernal area or the chest? Does your tummy hurt? struggling to swallow? Does swallowing hurt? Is it vomiting or nausea? abdominal bloating or distention? Have yellow skin (jaundice)? vomiting that is hemorrhagic (hematemesis)? stool that is dark or tarry? Scratched stools? Constipation? diarrhea or other alterations to bowel habits (Weledji, 2020). Patients do not receive Hepatitis A or B vaccines.

Objective Portion

The general assessment of the patient is not standardized. The vital signs section does not include the patient’s oxygen saturation or BMI. Every recent journey should be taken into account to assess GI problems related to travel. The physical exam of the skin should cover any skin changes, notably any yellowing that would suggest jaundice from cholestasis (Ball et al., 2019). Since changes in urine color can be an indication of cholestasis, a disorder in which the kidneys eliminate direct bilirubin from the serum, this topic belongs under the genitourinary area.

When a patient complains of stomach pain, nausea, and/or vomiting, the Gastrointestinal system should be thoroughly evaluated. The four quadrants of the abdomen should be evaluated using sonography, percussion, and palpation, as well as objective data from examining and assessing the abdomen for shape, scars, pigmentation, symmetry, and abnormal protrusions. Because cholestasis may be associated with pale-colored feces, stools should be inspected for color. Blood in the stool is investigated to rule out GI hemorrhage (Gallaher & Charles, 2022). Variations in appetite, nutrition, or food consumption must be taken into consideration in this assessment. For evaluating organ performance, it is essential to get the missing laboratory results.

Assessment Supported

A history of alcohol consumption supports the diagnosis of pancreatitis in the context of symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain that radiates to the back (Hamm, 2021). Other tests to support pancreatitis diagnosis include elevated amylase and/or lipase levels that are 3 times higher than the upper limit of normal. Moreover, the CT ought to back up this diagnosis.

This diagnosis of AAA is unsupported because the patient in this case seems stable and lacks several of the crucial presenting symptoms. This diagnosis necessitates figuring out whether or not the AAA is raptured based on the symptoms that are now present. The majority of cases with AAA are undiagnosed and asymptomatic (Weledji, 2020). The initial imaging procedure necessary for this diagnosis, if the patient is not allergic to contrast or pregnant, is a CT scan with contrast.

A perforated ulcer is not supported by either subjective or objective facts. A burst peptic ulcer is identified by the classic trifecta of sudden onset of abdominal rigidity, tachycardia, and stomach distress. Both the patient’s heart rate and the abdomen are not tachycardic (Ball et al., 2019). A history of smoking is the only risk factor for PUD; the patient does not use any NSAIDS or steroids.

Diagnostic Tests

Many medical conditions can cause abdominal discomfort, and numerous tests may be necessary to identify the reason. In addition to a health history and physical exam, laboratory tests for blood, urine, stool, and enzymes may be utilized to aid in diagnosis. Abdominal abnormalities can also be found with imaging tests (Ball et al., 2019). Diagnostic tests will include an Electrocardiogram, which would disclose any aberrant cardiac findings and exclude ischemia due to the patient’s specific presentation of stomach discomfort.

Blood tests including the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), Complete Blood Count (CBC), and stool samples for magnesium and phosphorus are examples. To completely rule out an infection, they are crucial (Weledji, 2020). As the patient complains of frequently having diarrhea, the CMP would provide a current health status of the kidneys, liver, and electrolytes. Test for Liver Enzymes and Hepatic Function These examinations reveal how well the liver is working. This examination will demonstrate if the liver is successfully removing the body’s toxins, which may result in severe stomach discomfort. This is crucial because a portion of the liver can be found in the epigastric region 4.

Rejection or Acceptance

Unless more testing is done, I would not accept the diagnosis of AAA. While this patient complains of sporadic discomfort, his vital signs are stable, and even though individuals with AAA frequently arrive with tearing or ripping chest pain, this patient does not characterize his pain in such terms(Hafeez et al., 2018).

The major diagnosis is acute pancreatitis, which I accept. Hafeez et al. (2018) claim that acute pancreatitis may be diagnosed initially without the use of imaging and that the presence of stomach discomfort together with high lipase or amylase levels can help to confirm this diagnosis. Also, the patient has a known etiology such as alcoholism and hyperlipidemia (Grigorian et al., 2019).

Possible Conditions

Gastritis may be the cause of the abrupt onset of epigastric discomfort, nausea, and vomiting (Weledji, 2020). It could be brought on by elements like smoking and drinking, which LZ’s past demonstrates. The patient might additionally have gastritis as a result of stress, such as losing his job.

Ulcer perforation: For two days, the patient’s condition, such as stomach pain, grew worse. This is how ulcer perforation presents. From modest stomach aches to severe agony and tachycardia, it goes through many stages (Yamamoto et al., 2018). H. pylori infection or regular use of NSAIDs, which can damage the stomach lining, maybe the cause of this.

Cholecystitis causes the gallbladder to swell up. With nausea, purging, and fever as their accompanying symptoms, biliary colic is an increasing pain in the right upper quadrant that may progress to the back (Gallaher & Charles, 2022). Jaundice is evident depending on the degree of gallbladder neck obstruction. The attack typically happens after a large, fatty meal. The pain eventually develops into a little upper-right stomach discomfort or a nagging ache. Abdominal ultrasound can identify calcified gallstones, and elevated white blood cell counts in the test findings can help to make the diagnosis.

Conclusion

The 65-year-old Black American male patient is likely suffering from gastritis. This may be the cause of the abrupt onset of epigastric discomfort, nausea, and vomiting.In addition to the pertinent lab testing to rule out the differential diagnosis, additional findings that might assist corroborate this diagnosis have been noted above. Correct diagnosis is essential for fostering the creation of the most efficient care strategy.

References

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.ISBN: 9780323545389

Gallaher, J. R., & Charles, A. (2022). Acute Cholecystitis: A Review. JAMA, 327(10), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.2350

Grigorian, A., Lin, M. Y., & de Virgilio, C. (2019). Severe epigastric pain with nausea and vomiting. Surgery, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05387-1_20

Hafeez, A., Karmo, D., Mercado-Alamo, A., & Halalau, A. (2018). Aortic dissection presenting as acute pancreatitis: Suspecting the unexpected. Case Reports in Cardiology, 2018, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4791610

Hamm, R. G. (2021). Acute Pancreatitis: Causation, Diagnosis, and Classification Using Computed Tomography. Radiologic Technology, 93(2), 197CT219CT. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34728586/

Weledji, E. P. (2020). An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation. Frontiers in Surgery, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901

Yamamoto, K., Takahashi, O., Arioka, H., & Kobayashi, D. (2018). Evaluation of risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer. BMC Gastroenterology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0756-4

The assessment is supported by the objective and subjective information. This is observed the patient had stated a history of pain in the stomach. The pain then became worse. The patient sough medical intervention from a hospital though there was no relief. The pain increased in severity until he vomited. Then the patient went to the hospital again until it was identified the patient is experiencing pain in the epigastric region consistent with occurrence of abdominal pain. This all supports the chief complaint. The listed differentials are also relevant as they are conditions affecting the abdominal region hence are in line with what is affecting the patient (Dains & Scheibel, 2019).

A woman went to the emergency room for severe abdominal cramping. She was diagnosed with diverticulitis; however, as a precaution, the doctor ordered a CT scan. The CT scan revealed a growth on the pancreas, which turned out to be pancreatic cancer—the real cause of the cramping.

Because of a high potential for misdiagnosis, determining the precise cause of abdominal pain can be time consuming and challenging. By analyzing case studies of abnormal abdominal findings, nurses can prepare themselves to better diagnose conditions in the abdomen.

In this Lab Assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.

To Prepare

Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.

With regard to the Episodic note case study provided:

Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.

Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

The Assignment

Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?

What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

The SOAP note concerns a 47-year-old white man with chief complaints of abdominal pain and diarrhea. He has had generalized abdominal pain for three days but has not taken any meds to relieve the pain. He reports that the pain was initially at 9/10 but has reduced to 5/10, and he cannot eat due to ensuing nausea. His medical history is positive for

hypertension, DM, and GI bleeding. GI exam findings include a soft abdomen, hyperactive bowel sounds, and LLQ pain. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the SOAP note, identify appropriate diagnostic tests, and discuss likely diagnoses.

Subjective Portion

The SOAP note’s HPI describes the abdominal pain, including the onset, location, associated symptoms, and severity of pain. Nevertheless, the HPI should have given an additional description of the abdominal pain, particularly the duration of the abdominal pain, timing (before, during, or after meals), and frequency. In addition, the characteristics of the abdominal pain should be included describing if the pain is sharp, crampy, dull, colicky, diffuses, constant, or radiating (Sokic-Milutinovic et al., 2022).

In addition, the HPI should have included the exacerbating and alleviating factors for the abdominal pain and to what level the alleviating factors relieve the pain. Furthermore, the HPI has described only the abdominal pain leaving out diarrhea. It should describe diarrhea, including the onset, timing, frequency, characteristics of the stools (watery, mucoid, bloody, greasy, or malodorous), and relieving and aggravating factors.

The subjective part should have included the patient’s immunization status with a focus on the last Tdap, Influenza, and COVID shots and surgical history. The social history has scanty information and should have included the patient’s education level, occupation, current living status, hobbies, exercise and sleep patterns, dietary habits, and health promotion interventions (Gossman et al., 2020). Lastly, a review of systems (ROS) is mandatory for a SOAP note. Thus, the SOAP note should have a ROS that indicates the pertinent positive and negative symptoms in each body system, which helps identify other symptoms the patient has not reported in the HPI.

Objective Portion

The objective part misses critical information like the findings from the general assessment of the patient, which should include the client’s general appearance, personal hygiene, grooming, dressing, speech, body language, and attitude towards the clinician. In addition, findings from a detailed abdominal exam should have been provided. For instance, it should have inspection findings, including the abdomen’s pigmentation, respiratory movements, symmetry, contour, and presence of scars.

Additional auscultation findings that should be indicated include the presence of friction ribs, vascular sounds, and venous hum. It should also have exam findings from palpation and percussion, including abdominal tenderness, masses, organomegaly, guarding, or rebound tenderness (Sokic-Milutinovic et al., 2022). Besides, the liver span and spleen position should be indicated.

Assessment

The assessment findings identified in the SOAP note are Left lower quadrant (LLQ) pain and gastroenteritis (GE). LLQ pain is supported by subjective findings of abdominal pain and LLQ tenderness on exam. GE is consistent with subjective data of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea and objective data of low-grade fever of 99.8 and hyperactive bowel sounds, which are classic symptoms.

Diagnostic Tests

The appropriate diagnostic tests for this patient are stool culture, complete blood count (CBC), and abdominal ultrasound. A stool culture is crucial to look for ova and cyst, which will help establish the causative agent for diarrhea and guide the treatment plan. Based on the WBC count, the CBC will establish if the patient has an infection and if the infection is bacterial or viral (Sokic-Milutinovic et al., 2022). The abdominal ultrasound will be used to visualize abdominal organs and identify if there is inflammation that could be contributing to the patient’s GI symptoms.

Differential Diagnoses

I would accept the GE diagnosis because it is consistent with the patient’s clinical features of diarrhea, generalized abdominal pain, nausea, low-grade fever, hyperactive bowel sounds, and abdominal tenderness. Nevertheless, I would reject LLQ pain as a diagnosis because it is a physical exam finding and does not fit the description of a medical diagnosis. The likely diagnoses for this case are:

Acute Viral Gastroenteritis

Viral GE is an acute, self-limiting diarrheal disease caused by viruses. The common causative viruses are rotavirus, norovirus, enteric adenovirus, and astroviruses. Clinical manifestations include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, watery diarrhea, abdominal pain/tenderness (mild to moderate), low-grade fever, dehydration, and hyperactive bowel sounds (Orenstein, 2020). Acute Viral GE is a presumptive diagnosis due to the patient’s clinical manifestations of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, mild fever, abdominal tenderness on palpation, and hyperactive bowel sounds.

Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

UC is a chronic inflammatory and ulcerative GI disorder that occurs in the colonic mucosa and is characterized by bloody diarrhea. Clinical symptoms include mild lower abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, and bloody mucoid stools. Systemic manifestations include anorexia, nausea, fever, malaise, anemia, and weight loss (Porter et al., 2020). The patient’s positive findings of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and mild fever, as well as a history of GI bleeding, makes UC a likely diagnosis.

Colonic Diverticulitis

Diverticulitis presents with inflammation of a diverticulum with the presence or absence of infection. Abdominal pain is the primary symptom of colonic diverticulitis. Patients present with LLQ abdominal pain and tenderness, which can sometimes be suprapubic and often have a palpable sigmoid. The abdominal pain is usually accompanied by fever, nausea, vomiting, and occasionally urinary symptoms (Swanson & Strate, 2018). Peritoneal signs like rebound and guarding can occur, especially with abscess or perforation. Colonic diverticulitis is a probable diagnosis based on nausea, mild fever, and LLQ pain findings.

Conclusion

The HPI in the objective portion should have described the characteristics of the abdominal pain and stated the onset, frequency, characteristics, and timing of diarrhea. A ROS should also be included with the patient’s positive and negative symptoms. The objective part should have detailed physical exam findings from a detailed abdominal exam. Diagnostic tests should include stool culture, CBC, and abdominal U/S. The likely diagnoses are Vital GE, Ulcerative colitis, and colonic diverticulitis.

References

Gossman, W., Lew, V., & Ghassemzadeh, S. (2020). SOAP Notes. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.

Orenstein, R. (2020). Gastroenteritis, Viral. Encyclopedia of Gastroenterology, 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.65973-1

Porter, R. J., Kalla, R., & Ho, G. T. (2020). Ulcerative colitis: Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis. F1000Research, 9, F1000 Faculty Rev-294. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20805.1

Sokic-Milutinovic, A., Pavlovic-Markovic, A., Tomasevic, R. S., & Lukic, S. (2022). Diarrhea as a Clinical Challenge: General Practitioner Approach. Digestive Diseases, 40(3), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517111

Swanson, S. M., & Strate, L. L. (2018). Acute Colonic Diverticulitis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 168(9), ITC65–ITC80. https://doi.org/10.7326/AITC201805010

The SOAP note’s 65-year-old Black American male patient arrives at the emergency room complaining of sporadic epigastric stomach ache that radiates to his back. When he went to the neighboring urgent care facility, PPIs were provided to him without providing any relief. The patient reported that the pain had been worse over the preceding few hours and he had vomited the afternoon when he finally went to the emergency department. He hasn’t had a fever, diarrhea, or any other signs often associated with stomach discomfort. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to evaluate the offered subjective and objective data to determine the patient’s primary and differential diagnoses.

Subjective Portion

According to the OLDCARTS technique, the HPI lacks information on the kind, intensity, and aggravating and alleviating elements of the pain. In addition, there is no information on the color or consistency of vomit (Ball et al., 2019).The date of the HTN diagnosis and if the illness has been treated are missing from the PMH. This section ID also lacks information on previous hospitalizations and surgical histories. The dosage and frequency of metoprolol are not listed in the medication section.

The allergy section does not address allergies to food, the environment, or latex. A family history should include information on all first-degree relatives, including parents, grandparents, siblings, and their children. Add details on the person’s age, whether they’re living or deceased, and how they’re feeling. Any dead relatives’ age and method of death should also be mentioned. Age and any ailments should be mentioned if the person is still alive. It should also include a list of mental health issues including depression, addiction, and substance misuse.

Owing to the patient’s digestive issues, a comprehensive series of subjective GI system questions should be made, including Has the digestive illness continued for a considerable amount of time? Burning in the substernal area or the chest? Does your tummy hurt? struggling to swallow? Does swallowing hurt? Is it vomiting or nausea? abdominal bloating or distention? Have yellow skin (jaundice)? vomiting that is hemorrhagic (hematemesis)? stool that is dark or tarry? Scratched stools? Constipation? diarrhea or other alterations to bowel habits (Weledji, 2020). Patients do not receive Hepatitis A or B vaccines.

Objective Portion

The general assessment of the patient is not standardized. The vital signs section does not include the patient’s oxygen saturation or BMI. Every recent journey should be taken into account to assess GI problems related to travel. The physical exam of the skin should cover any skin changes, notably any yellowing that would suggest jaundice from cholestasis (Ball et al., 2019). Since changes in urine color can be an indication of cholestasis, a disorder in which the kidneys eliminate direct bilirubin from the serum, this topic belongs under the genitourinary area.

When a patient complains of stomach pain, nausea, and/or vomiting, the Gastrointestinal system should be thoroughly evaluated. The four quadrants of the abdomen should be evaluated using sonography, percussion, and palpation, as well as objective data from examining and assessing the abdomen for shape, scars, pigmentation, symmetry, and abnormal protrusions. Because cholestasis may be associated with pale-colored feces, stools should be inspected for color. Blood in the stool is investigated to rule out GI hemorrhage (Gallaher & Charles, 2022). Variations in appetite, nutrition, or food consumption must be taken into consideration in this assessment. For evaluating organ performance, it is essential to get the missing laboratory results.

Assessment Supported

A history of alcohol consumption supports the diagnosis of pancreatitis in the context of symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain that radiates to the back (Hamm, 2021). Other tests to support pancreatitis diagnosis include elevated amylase and/or lipase levels that are 3 times higher than the upper limit of normal. Moreover, the CT ought to back up this diagnosis.

This diagnosis of AAA is unsupported because the patient in this case seems stable and lacks several of the crucial presenting sym