HCAD 650 Discussion Topic baby charlie and end of life decisions case study 2
HCAD 650 Discussion Topic baby charlie and end of life decisions case study 2
HCAD 650 Discussion Topic baby charlie and end of life decisions case study 2
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HCAD 650 Discussion Topic baby charlie and end of life decisions case study 2 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
The tragic case of Charlie Gard, the British infant whose parents have just ended their legal fight to send him to the US for experimental treatment, has captured global attention.
The case is significant for a number of reasons, both in the huge amount of publicity it has attracted, its progression through several courts, and the number of influential commentators who became involved.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HCAD 650 Discussion Topic baby charlie and end of life decisions case study 2 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Not only does the case highlight the challenges for parents, doctors and judges in making end-of-life decisions about critically impaired infants, it is unique in another respect. It highlights the changing role of the wider public in shaping how decisions about medical treatment are made.
Here are three factors from the Charlie Gard case that could influence future cases around the world.
More than any case of this kind, advocates for Charlie Gard have been effective in mobilising support using social media and the internet.
Early on, Charlie’s family set up a website (with merchandise available), as well as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram accounts to highlight how they disagreed with doctors about their son’s care. The social media campaign was further bolstered by hashtags #charliesarmy and #charliesfight to keep the topic trending.
The campaign, which brought together supporters under the banner of “Charlie’s Army”, attracted support from US President Donald Trump, and the Pope.
The online campaign also raised awareness of Charlie’s rare genetic condition, mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, which in his case, resulted in muscle weakness and irreversible brain damage.
The social media campaign helped gather support for several protests about Charlie’s care. We’ve also seen criticisms of, and death threats against, Charlie’s treating doctors at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, again fuelled by social media.
Clearly, Charlie’s case has been played out both in the courts of law and the court of public opinion. The courts were asked to decide upon emotional and ethical issues. Yet, in this case, every aspect of Charlie’s life seems to have been played out through social media.