HCM 440 SNHU Impact of Telemedicine Annotated Bibliography
HCM 440 SNHU Impact of Telemedicine Annotated Bibliography
HCM 440 SNHU Impact of Telemedicine Annotated Bibliography
Description
This week you will be submitting your milestone, which directly supports the integrated review that you will be submitting for your final project. Using the annotated bibliography resources in the Reading and Resources area of this module, you will submit an annotated bibliography of six peer-reviewed research articles related to the research question that you have chosen. Please include a summary and analysis of the six research articles.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HCM 440 SNHU Impact of Telemedicine Annotated Bibliography completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Module reading and resources: https://guides.library.cornell.edu/c.php?g=32342&p…
https://libanswers.snhu.edu/faq/8744
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HCM 440 SNHU Impact of Telemedicine Annotated Bibliography done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAgmmJV3RlU
Research question
What is the impact of telemedicine and telehealth in reducing racial disparities in healthcare?
HCM 440 Annotated Bibliography Rubric Annotated bibliographies provide you with the opportunity to cite, summarize, and compare and contrast resources you will use in a paper. You will cite each resource in APA style, write an approximately 150-word description that summarizes the central theme and scope of the resource, and compare and contrast it with other resources. For more information on annotated bibliographies, consult the SNHU Writing Center’s annotated bibliography guide. Submit a summary and analysis of six research articles relevant to the research problem that you have chosen. Critical Elements Quality of Evidence Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria, is clear, and uses a variety of sources Proficient (85%) Uses six credible and reliable primary sources of research articles Needs Improvement (55%) Fewer than six reliable and credible primary sources of research articles are used Analysis of Evidence Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses substantial details to analyze the research article being evaluated Applicability to Research Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses substantial details to analyze the research article being evaluated Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively analyze the research article Identifies the central themes related to research problem. Clear description of the research methodology is presented Clearly identifies how research article contributes to the development of research topic Does not sufficiently link research article to research problem. Research methodology is not clearly presented Does not sufficiently identify how research article contributes to the development of the research topic Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively analyze the research article Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas. Correct APA format is used Organization Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format. APA format is used correctly with few to no errors Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively analyze the research article Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax. Correct APA format is used most of the time Not Evident (0%) Research articles used are not reliable or credible. Primary sources of research articles are not used There is no clear link between research article and research problem. Discussion of research methodology is not present Value 20 There is a lack of discussion on how the research article relates to the research topic 20 Organization of ideas is not evident 20 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas. Correct APA format is not used 20 Earned Total 100% 20
HCM 440 SNHU Impact of Telemedicine Annotated Bibliography Grid View
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||