HCS 446 University of Phoenix Facility Planning Floor Plan Paper
HCS 446 University of Phoenix Facility Planning Floor Plan Paper
HCS446v11d Facility Planning Guide
Health care facilities have uniquely defined characteristics based on the needs of the facility or population served. Poor design may lead to staff, visitor, or patient stress. In large facilities, the inability to find a department may lead to frustrations and disorientation. Poor layout may also lead to staff inefficiencies or fines because of failure to meet regulatory requirements. Throughout this course you will design a floor plan for the facility you selected in the Week 2 Facility Selection and Research assignment. This assignment illustrates the difficult balances between patient flow, workflow, safety, and aesthetics. You will use this document as a guide to understand the environmental design elements you should include in your final design. This document describes your assignment for each week. The emphasis of this series of assignments is on facts, concepts, requirements, planning, and so forth as outlined in the course and program objectives. Except for week three, the vast majority of points will be based on written components of the assignment. Even in week four, only a small portion of the points are allocated to the physical drawing. For the physical drawing, you may use the program of your choice to complete the floor plan. Some programs to consider are Microsoft® Excel®, PowerPoint®, Visio®, Publisher®, or online floor plan programs such as Floorsketcher, Draw.io, and Edraw. Lucidchart or Smartdraw will not be approved because of new limitations on their free trial offer. It is up to you to confirm that any free trial period will carry you through the end of class. Your faculty member will need to approve your choice, since he or she must be able to view your project in order to grade it. It is important to note that the purpose of this project is not to be an expert at creating a facility using your chosen program, but rather to ensure the concepts learned in this course can be applied to the facility design principles. Your use of the floor planning program is meant to enhance your learning of the course and program concepts. Week Two: Facility Selection and Research Select a facility from below to use in your final project. You will use this facility in Weeks 3 through 5. If you would like to use a facility not listed here, please check with your instructor for approval. • • • • • • • Assisted living Clinic Doctors’ office (specify specialty(ies)) Hematology lab or other referral treatment facility Hospital department (specify which department) Outpatient clinic (specify specialty(ies)) Skilled Nursing Facility Research the facility type. Write a 260- to 350-word summary. Your summary should: • • • • Identify the type of facility you selected Specify a location for your facility (state and region, city, neighborhood, and so forth) Explain why you have selected this type of facility and this location Describe the facility’s role in the health care industry Copyright© 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Facility Planning Template HCS/446 v11 Page 2 of 4 • Describe demographics of the populations who use the facility • Identify key structural characteristics of the facility • Use and cite Hayward and at least one other credible scholarly reference, using proper APA formatting for citation and reference listing. • Submit your assignment as an APA paper, Power Point, or other format of your choice. Week Three: Facility Planning—Floor Plan, Part 1 The construction of evidence-based health care facilities includes careful planning and layout as well as considerations for the health of the population to be served. Evidence-based health care facilities planning also needs input from a cross-functional team of informed stakeholders and the integration of best practices in modern design and regulatory requirements. This week and next, you will focus on your facility’s structure and the areas contained within it. In week five, you will add assets to your facility. Create a floorplan that includes at least 3 to 5 distinct areas or rooms. Consider the following elements and add them to your facility as appropriate: • • • Facility structure o Walls o Doors o Hallways o Waiting areas o Other related structural components Facility areas (but not equipment or furniture) o Customer service and amenities ▪ Reception desk, bathroom, shower, vending machine, etc. o Patient consultation areas o Clinical support areas ▪ Nurses’ station, charting areas, etc. o Administrative offices o Building support ▪ Laundry, generator facilities, housekeeping, etc. o Diagnostic and treatment space equipment and location o Mechanical equipment ▪ Space for laboratory equipment, radiology equipment, gases like oxygen, and suctions Do NOT include any equipment, furniture, or other assets. This week and next are focused strictly on floor plan layout. Write a 175- to 350-word response to the following prompts: • • • In terms of work flow: o Describe your facility o Describe your intended patient traffic flow o Describe your intended staff work flow Use and cite Hayward and at least one other credible scholarly reference, using proper APA formatting for citation and reference listing. Submit your written assignment as an APA paper, Power Point, or other format of your choice. Copyright© 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Facility Planning Template HCS/446 v11 Page 3 of 4 Submit a copy of the floorplan of your facility. Paste it at the end of your essay or submit a separate file. Use a standard file format that your instructor will be able to view. Print Screen or scanned images are also acceptable. Week Four: Facility Planning—Floor Plan, Part 2 This week you will continue to build your final facility. The legal team has asked you to provide them with considerations regarding legal and regulatory requirements that may affect the facility planning process. Make any changes to your drawing needed to meet regulatory considerations, such as: • • • • • Local and state zoning codes for your chosen location Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Credentialing requirements, such as the Joint Commission Do not add equipment, furniture, and other assets. Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper. Your paper should: • • • • • • Briefly o Acknowledge structural modifications to your floor plan o Note assets and equipment you add to your floor plan Analyze the flow of your project by using the software project planning tool of your choice to outline the design and construction of your facility, from start to finish. Gantt charts are often used, but you may choose a tool that works best for you. You will find some good examples at: https://zapier.com/blog/free-project-management-software/ In light of regulatory considerations: • Analyze the impact of federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements on your facility • Analyze accountability and liability requirements for staff and other stakeholders • Analyze the relationship between legal and ethical considerations of the requirements. Cite Hayward and at least 3 other credible scholarly references, using proper APA formatting for citation and reference listing. Submit your assignment as an APA paper Submit an updated copy of the floorplan of your facility. Paste it at the end of your essay or submit a separate file. Use a standard file format that your instructor will be able to view. Print Screen or scanned images are also acceptable. Week Five: Facility Planning—Floor Plan, Part 3 This week you will consider how your facility impacts the environment and review your facility to consider any additional changes based on the knowledge you have gained throughout the course. Add to your drawing: • Furniture, equipment, and other assets to your facility as needed for sustainability, patient, staff, families, and so forth. Write a 350- to 700-word response to the following: Copyright© 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. • • • • • • Facility Planning Template HCS/446 v11 Page 4 of 4 Briefly review how your health care facility will address the community needs of your specific chosen location. Research and describe design elements, technology, and equipment you could use to support the environment sustainability of your facility. Note that “sustainability” refers to environmental responsibility more than fiscal performance. Very briefly describe successes and challenges during your facility design. o Describe successes experienced while designing your facility. o Describe challenges experienced while designing your facility. o Describe what you would do differently to address your challenges. Cite Hayward and at least 2 other credible scholarly references, using proper APA formatting for citation and reference listing. Submit your assignment as an APA paper, Power Point, or other format of your choice. Submit an updated copy of the floorplan of your facility. Paste it at the end of your essay or submit a separate file. Use a standard file format that your instructor will be able to view. Print Screen or scanned images are also acceptable. Copyright© 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HCS 446 University of Phoenix Facility Planning Floor Plan Paper completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.  Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?Get your assignment on HCS 446 University of Phoenix Facility Planning Floor Plan Paper done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||