LDR 615 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark – Change Initiative: Implementation, Evaluation, and Sustainability

LDR 615 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark – Change Initiative: Implementation, Evaluation, and Sustainability

Assessment Description

You will utilize your change model for this assignment. Review the feedback submitted by your instructor on your previous change model assignment. Make any changes or modifications necessary for the submission of this assignment.

Evaluate the performance of your organization or department. Identify an area that would significantly benefit from initiating a change. Write a paper (1,500-1,750 words) in which you describe the particular area you propose to address through a change initiative. Include the following for your company:

1. Discuss the issues in this area and the current outcomes as a result of the issues.
2. Describe the external and/or internal driving forces, contributing issues, and the people affected.
3. Evaluate the stakeholders involved and discuss how they will be affected by your change initiative.
4. Clarify your role and responsibility as a change leader. Discuss the leadership theory (or theories) you will use to guide the change process.
5. Discuss the change agents you need to recruit in order to successfully implement your change. Describe the roles of these change agents.
6. Utilize your change model to develop strategies: (a) Explain the relevance of this model to your organization; and (b) Present the strategic aspects using your model. Be sure to clearly define the purpose of each aspect, the people involved, and the actions that need to be taken.
7. Identify, or predict, the potential barriers to change. Discuss possible ways to overcome these obstacles, including methods for dealing with emerging or unforeseen circumstances that could impede implementation.
8. Describe the evaluation methods you will use to determine the level of success of your change initiative. Discuss what metrics or measureable determinates you will use.
9. Propose strategies to anchor change or support continuous change.
10. Establish how your change plan supports the organizational mission/goal, genuinely addresses stakeholder concerns, and will serve as an equitable contribution for the community or society overall.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MSL, MBA, MSL in Leadership with an Emphasis in Homeland Security and Emergency Management 1.5

Demonstrate flexibility and adaptability in response to changing or unknown circumstances.

MSL, MSL in Leadership and Homeland Security and Emergency Mgmnt 3.5; MBA and MSN Leadership in Health Care Systems 6.2; MBA and MSL 6.5

Develop strategy for implementing and managing change within an organization.

Also Read:  Nova QNT 5160 Quiz 4 2018

Benchmark – Change Initiative: Implementation, Evaluation, and Sustainability – Rubric

Collapse All Benchmark – Change Initiative: Implementation, Evaluation, And Sustainability – RubricCollapse All

The Need for Change

25 points

Criteria Description

The Need for Change

5. Excellent

25 points

The need for change including specifying the issue and the current outcomes resulting from the issue is thoroughly discussed with rich detail, including all necessary elements.

4. Good

21.75 points

The need for change including specifying the issue and the current outcomes resulting from the issue is discussed, including all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

The need for change including specifying the issue and the current outcomes resulting from the issue is included, but discussion is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.5 points

The need for change including specifying the issue and the current outcomes resulting from the issue is discussed, but discussion is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The need for change including specifying the issue and the current outcomes resulting from the issue is not discussed.

Driving Forces

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Driving Forces

5. Excellent

12.5 points

Description of internal and/or external driving forces, contributing issues, and people affected is thoroughly discussed with rich detail, including all necessary elements.

4. Good

10.88 points

Description of internal and/or external driving forces, contributing issues, and people affected is discussed, including all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Description of internal and/or external driving forces, contributing issues, and people affected is included, but discussion is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Description of internal and/or external driving forces, contributing issues, and people affected is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Description of internal and/or external driving forces, contributing issues, and people affected is not included.

Stakeholder Evaluation

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Stakeholder Evaluation

5. Excellent

12.5 points

Evaluation of stakeholders and how they will be affected by the change initiative is thoroughly discussed with rich detail, including all necessary elements.

4. Good

10.88 points

Evaluation of stakeholders and how they will be affected by the change initiative is discussed, including all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Evaluation of stakeholders and how they will be affected by the change initiative is included, but discussion is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Evaluation of stakeholders and how they will be affected by the change initiative is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evaluation of stakeholders and how they will be affected by the change initiative is not included.

The Role of the Leader in the Change Initiative

25 points

Criteria Description

The Role of the Leader in the Change Initiative

5. Excellent

25 points

The role of the leader in the change initiative is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes discussion of all necessary elements.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: LDR 615 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark – Change Initiative: Implementation, Evaluation, and Sustainability

4. Good

21.75 points

The role of the leader in the change initiative is presented and includes discussion of all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

The role of the leader in the change initiative is presented, but it is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.5 points

The role of the leader in the change initiative is present, but it is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The role of the leader in the change initiative is not addressed.

Change Agents and Roles

25 points

Criteria Description

Change Agents and Roles

5. Excellent

25 points

Discussion of necessary change agents and their respective roles in implementing change is thoroughly discussed with rich detail, including all necessary elements.

4. Good

21.75 points

Discussion of necessary change agents and their respective roles in implementing change is discussed, including all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

Discussion of necessary change agents and their respective roles in implementing change is included, but discussion is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.5 points

Discussion of necessary change agents and their respective roles in implementing change is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of necessary change agents and their respective roles in implementing change is not included.

Application of the Change Model to Develop Strategies (B)

25 points

Criteria Description

Application of the Change Model to Develop Strategies Develop strategy for implementing and managing change within an organization. (C 3.5, 6.5)

5. Excellent

25 points

The change model is thoroughly applied with rich detail and the resulting strategies include all necessary elements.

4. Good

21.75 points

The change model is thoroughly applied and the resulting strategies include all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

The change model is applied, but the resulting strategies are cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.5 points

The change model is applied, but the resulting strategies are incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The change model is not applied to develop strategies.

Overcoming Barriers to Change (B)

25 points

Criteria Description

Overcoming Barriers to Change Demonstrate flexibility and adaptability in response to changing or unknown circumstances. (C 1.5)

5. Excellent

25 points

Overcoming barriers to change is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes discussion of all necessary elements.

4. Good

21.75 points

Overcoming barriers to change is presented and includes discussion of all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

Overcoming barriers to change is presented, but it is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.5 points

Overcoming barriers to change is presented, but it is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Overcoming barriers to change is not addressed.

Evaluation Methods

25 points

Criteria Description

Evaluation Methods

5. Excellent

25 points

Evaluation methods for determining the success of the change initiative are extremely thorough with specific metrics or measurable determinants clearly defined and numerous relevant details.

4. Good

21.75 points

Evaluation methods for determining the success of the change initiative are complete and include specific metrics or measurable determinants and relevant details.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

Evaluation methods for determining the success of the change initiative are included but lack specific metrics or measurable determinants and relevant details.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.5 points

Evaluation methods for determining the success of the change initiative are incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evaluation methods for determining the success of the change initiative are not included.

Strategies for Sustaining Change

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Strategies for Sustaining Change

5. Excellent

12.5 points

Strategies for sustaining change are thoroughly presented with rich detail and include discussion of all necessary elements.

4. Good

10.88 points

Strategies for sustaining change are complete and include discussion of all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Strategies for sustaining change are presented, but discussion is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Strategies for sustaining change are incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Strategies for sustaining change are not addressed.

Overall Effectiveness of Change Plan

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Overall Effectiveness of Change Plan

5. Excellent

12.5 points

Discussion of how the change plan supports the organizational mission and goals, addresses stakeholder concerns, and contributes to the community of society is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes discussion of all necessary elements.

4. Good

10.88 points

Discussion of how the change plan supports the organizational mission and goals, addresses stakeholder concerns, and contributes to the community of society is presented and includes discussion of all necessary elements.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Discussion of how the change plan supports the organizational mission and goals, addresses stakeholder concerns, and contributes to the community of society is cursory and lacking in depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Discussion of how the change plan supports the organizational mission and goals, addresses stakeholder concerns, and contributes to the community of society is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of how the change plan supports the organizational mission and goals, addresses stakeholder concerns, and contributes to the community of society is not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

6.53 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

12.5 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

10.88 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Excellent

12.5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

10.88 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

4.35 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.7 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

12.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

10.88 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

9.88 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.25 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

LDR 615 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark – Change Initiative: Implementation, Evaluation, and Sustainability

Assignment benchmark

Modern health organizations face a variety of difficulties that jeopardize their effectiveness. The use of new technology that will improve the caliber, safety, and effectiveness of operations is one of them. Other service providers’ competitiveness is another aspect of it. Maintaining a workforce presents difficulties for health organizations as well. It is acknowledged that ineffective personnel management raises the administrative costs related to recruiting new staff. Therefore, it is crucial that they identify powerful tactics that will increase their operational effectiveness and their ability to offer their customers high-quality services. As a result, this essay looks at a part of my business that will gain a lot from the start of change. In order to address the problem of low nurse retention in the hospital, the suggested adjustment comprises the provision of programs that aim to promote employee growth.
Issues in the Region and Results
Human resource management has been a problem at the hospital where I work. Most nurses leave the hospital after a year, according to a recent audit that was carried out. It was discovered that a tiny number of nurses had worked at the hospital for longer than three years. The approaches used to promote the retention of nurses in the hospital were found to be ineffective after an investigation into the variables causing their low retention. For instance, actions that benefit nurses do not often take into account the findings of performance reviews. Additionally, the nurses are not given chances to advance their professional and personal development. In order to encourage these employees, reward packages are occasionally used. The hospital has had to spend a lot of money on hiring, training, orienting, and inducting new nurses as a result of these inefficiencies, which have also led to a high rate of staff turnover within the first year of employment, a reduction in the quality of care, and high employee turnover rates (Hughes, 2019). Therefore, it is crucial that sensible measures be taken to overcome this organizational problem.
forces both internal and external Driving Factors and Those Affected Internal and external pressures are said to have an impact on the problem of low employee retention within the first year of employment at the hospital. External forces are outside the institution, whilst internal forces are those present within the organization. Dissatisfaction among the staff is one of the internal elements causing the problem. Workplace environments that support employees’ personal and professional growth are necessary. These terms could include opportunities for job promotion, pay raises, and training to keep them current on issues that are relevant to their line of work (Hughes, 2019). The rate of worker turnover within the first year of employment has grown as a result of the absence or subpar implementation of these conditions. Ineffective human resources management is the other internal factor contributing to the low staff retention rate during the first year of employment. The hospital’s human resources division should determine the best strategies for resolving the problem. Management inefficiencies are the other internal driving driver. Identification of evidence-based treatments to address the problem should involve the management. Competition is one of the outside forces influencing the problem. The majority of hospitals offer nurses and other healthcare professionals attractive compensation packages to entice them away from the facility. The workforce’s evolving requirements in nursing is the other factor. The hospital should determine the current and anticipated requirements of the nurses and develop strategies for meeting them (Pasmore, 2015). Stakeholders including nurses, other healthcare practitioners, nurse managers, and patients are impacted by the problem of low nurse retention during their first year of work.
Stakeholders Involved and How the Change Initiative Will Affect Them
A variety of hospital stakeholders will be impacted by the proposed change. According to Hodges (2016), personnel who wi