NR 391 Week 2 Discussion Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment
NR 391 Week 2 Discussion Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment
NR 391 Week 2 Discussion Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment
Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment
Nurses complete assessments on individuals on a daily basis. Self-assessments are in order before considering our abilities to provide culturally competent nursing care.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 391 Week 2 Discussion Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
1. Complete the Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment Form located in Doc Sharing.
2. Note the number of “no” answers in your self-assessment.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 391 Week 2 Discussion Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
3. Share one or two of your “no” answers with your classmates and describe how you will convert the “no” to a “yes” over the next few weeks.
4. What interventions are needed to turn each “no” into a “yes” response?
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 391 Week 2 Discussion Transcultural Nursing Skills Self-Assessment
Participation: RN-to-BSN
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
1. Attendance
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
- Integrate professional resources
- Engage in meaningful and respectful dialogue with classmates
- Express thoughts clearly and logically
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of two (2) times in each graded thread. These two (2) posts must be on two (2) separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Participation points: If your posts do not meet the participation requirements (above) 20% points will be deducted from a thread. Each thread is graded independently. You will receive a 20% point deduction in each thread if:
- your first post in each thread is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday, OR
- you do not post a second time in each thread
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. These two posts must be on 2 separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. mountain time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
| Discussion Criteria | A (92-100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B (84-91%) Very good or high level of performance |
C (76-83%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
F (0-75%) Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responds to the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week based on assigned reading(s) and weekly course lesson. 32% points | Thoroughly answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts. | Answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts. | Answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts. | Does not respond to the initial discussion question(s). Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of weekly concepts. |
| Supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources from assigned reading and/or textbook, and lesson. 24% points | Thoroughly supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that include lesson and assigned readings and may also include professional journal articles. Ideas are credited* to the source. | Supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that include lesson or assigned readings that are credited* to the source. | Satisfactorily supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that mention the lesson or assigned readings but source is not noted. | Little or no support of ideas and opinions with any experiences or resources. |
| Engages in meaningful and respectful dialogue with classmates before the end of the week. 28% points | Responds to classmates and/or instructor by name in a respectful manner speaking to the points already made by others, furthering the dialogue through clarification and additional knowledge, thereby contributing much depth to the discussion. | Usually responds to classmates and/or instructor by name and always in a respectful manner speaking to the points already made by others, furthering the dialogue and adds some depth to the discussion. | Unable to determine to whom the person is speaking but is respectful speaking to the points already made by others, but does not further the discussion. | Responds to classmates and/or instructor in a disrespectful manner or responses are not on topic causing distraction to the discussion. |
| Communicates in a professional manner. 16% points | Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (uses accurate English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation with minimal errors). | Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). | Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (many errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). | Presents information that is not clear, logical, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). |
| Participation Posts a minimum of two (2) times in each graded thread. These two (2) posts must be on two (2) separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 pm MT on Wednesday. 20% of points are deducted per thread if this criterion is not met. A zero is the lowest score possible per thread and each thread is graded independently. | NO points added or deducted if minimum requirements are met. | Deduct 20% of points if minimum requirements are NOT met. | ||
| *Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Example: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…. Smith (2010) claimed that….. Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. | ||||