NR 393: Week 2 project The Impact of Chronic Illness

NR 393: Week 2 project The Impact of Chronic Illness

NR 393: Week 2 project The Impact of Chronic Illness

Identify one person from the illness group you chose in Week
1. The person should not be a patient at the facility in which you work. You
can use friends, family members, or coworkers. Do not use the person’s name in
the paper but only initials. Administer the questionnaire you created in Week 1
to that person. Compile the data and analyze the responses to better illustrate
where this person, his or her family, and friends are in relation to accepting
the diagnosis in relation to the standard health or illness definitions. The
analysis should also include coping skills, treatment, and support aspects of
the illness. Identify how this will direct care plan development for the chosen
illness group.

Compile a report of your interview with the questions you
created, the responses you received, your analysis, and your interpretation of
how it will affect planning care for the group in a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word
document.

Support your responses with examples.

On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA
format.

Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for
properly citing resources.

This handout will provide you the details of formatting your
essay using APA style.

You may create your essay in this APA-formatted template.

Assignment Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
In 3–4 pages, address the following:

A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.
o What is its purpose?
o How is it conducted?
o What information does it gather?

Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with specific detail describes how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers.

Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)

The response accurately describes how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response vaguely and/or with some inaccuracy describes how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response is inaccurate or missing descriptions of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test assigned is used in healthcare, including its purpose, how it is conducted, and what information it gathers.
Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool’s validity and reliability, and explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values.

Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and thoroughly evaluates the test or tool’s validity and reliability, and explains any issues with clear sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is clear, accurate, and appropriate for the evaluation.

Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately evaluates the test or tool’s validity and reliability, and explains any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is somewhat clear, accurate,and appropriate for the evaluation.

Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 393: Week 2 project The Impact of Chronic Illness 

The response vaguely and/or with some inaccuracy evaluates the test or tool’s validity and reliability, and explains any issues with some sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is vague or inaccurate for the evaluation. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)
“The response is inaccurate and/or missing evaluations of the test or tool’s validity and reliability, with explanations of any issues missing or lacking sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Student’s research is missing, inaccurate, or lacking for the evaluation.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Also Check Out:  NR 393: Week 3 project