NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice?

NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice?

NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice?

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice?

Connection Between Theory and Practice

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice?  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory

          The integrative theory that applies most to my clinical practice would be Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (SCDNT). The SCDNT is commonly seen in rehabilitative nursing because it focuses on teaching patients to care for themselves by giving them the knowledge and means to do so. I currently work in an 80-bed inpatient rehabilitation hospital that is stroke certified through The Joint Commission. This theory applies most to my clinical practice because a large part of my job is treating patients with some form of a self-care deficit. Nursing patients who have been newly affected by a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke will require teaching and education on new techniques and methods regarding how to care for themselves following a stroke. Patients affected by stroke commonly have to relearn many basic activities of daily living (ADLs). Common ADLs are eating, dressing, getting in or out of bed, toileting, bathing or showering, preparing meals, managing money, shopping, doing housework, using a telephone, etc. Using Orem’s SCDNT as the foundation for nursing interventions geared towards stroke patients helps to empower patients to not only participate in their care but to recognize and respond to potential future strokes (Sposito et al., 2018). The SCDNT is comprised of four concepts (Smith, 2020). The concepts are the Theory of Self-Care, the Theory of Self-Care Deficit, the Theory of Nursing Systems, and finally the Theory of Dependent Care (Irshad-Ali, 2018). The Theory of Self-Care focuses on intentionally performing tasks by one’s self that are necessary for life, human functioning, and health (Smith, 2020). The Theory of Dependent care focuses on the patient being in a dependent position or relationship, like that of a child and a parent (Smith, 2020). The Theory of Self-Care Deficit described why people need nursing such as health-related shortcomings for comprehending, determining, and yielding care to one’s self (Smith, 2020). Finally, the Theory of Nursing Systems encompasses the other three theories and adds the interpersonal relationship between the nurse and the patient (Smith, 2020).

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice? done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

          One example of the application of the SCDNT is Ghani et al., (2019) description of a 62-year-old male patient affected by a CVA resulting in left hemiparesis and dysphagia. A holistic approach to the patient’s care was provided using the elements of the SCDNT. The care provided was based on creating a means for the patient to meet his own self-care needs. Using the SCDNT, the nurse was able to assist and care for the patient while supplying an environment appropriate for enriching the remaining self-care skills and nurturing the development of new ones (Ghani et al., 2019). All of this was achieved through nasogastric tube feeding to prevent dehydration or malnutrition, providing rest breaks during activities to reduce fatigue, checking vital signs frequently, providing aids for communication and means for orientation, teaching affected extremity self-positioning techniques, demonstrating the use of adaptive tools and techniques for ADLs, teaching stroke signs and symptoms, medication management and education, and collaborating with other departments such as physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, the dietician, and physician (Ghani et al., 2019). Despite attempting to teach stroke patients to care for themselves, some deficits may remain that they are unable to accomplish, which is known as dependency (Sposito et al., 2018). It was concluded that although the patient did not recover fully, he showed remarkable improvement and gradual development of the ability to care for himself, develop new skills, and prevent recurrent stroke (Ghani et al., 2019). This was all achieved through nursing care that was based on Dorothea Orem’s SCDNT.

References

Ghani, N., Suliman, M., & Fatima, A. (2019). Application of Orem’s nursing theory to a stroke patient: A case study. Journal of Saidu

          Medical College9(2), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2019.9.2.

Irshad-Ali, B. H. (2018). Application of Orem self care deficit theory on psychiatric patient. Annals of Nursing and Practice5(1),

          1093–1095. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bibi-Hajira-Wali/publication/343125237_Central_Bringing_Excellence_in_

          Open_Access_Annals_of_Nursing_and_Practice_Application_of_Orem_Self_Care_Deficit_Theory_on_

          Psychiatric_Patient/links/5f17bc21a6fdcc9626a685df/Central-Bringing-Excellence-in-Open-Access-Annals-of-

          Nursing-and-Practice-Application-of-Orem-Self-Care-Deficit-Theory-on-Psychiatric-Patient.pdf

Smith, M. C. (2020). Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed.). F.A. Davis.

Sposito, J., Zipf, A., Alhowaymel, F., Almutairi, M., & Breda, K. (2018). Community-based stroke recognition education and response:

          An evidence-based intervention project. Creative Nursing24(4), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.24.4.251

Hello Class,
Our Course Objectives (CO) for this week and corresponding MSN Program Objective (PO) are:
Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Examine instances where theory is used to guide the development of new knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice. (PO #6).

Grand theories are more abstract or general in nature and middle-range theories that are more specific in nature. What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand theory to support your views.
I look forward to reading your examples!

For this week’s discussion, please answer this question:
What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and application to clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand range theory to support your views.

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 501 Week 4 What Relationship(s) Do You Find Between Grand Nursing Theories and Clinical Practice?

Scholarly Resources:Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include:Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals:Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStormto check your writing.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA 

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost -5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Similar Posts