NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment
NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment
NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment
The Application of Theory assignment is due Sunday 11:59pm MT at the end of Week 5. Please use your textbooks listed below to complete the assignment this week. The guidelines and rubric for this assignment are also listed below and in Course Resources.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Groenwald, S. L. (Ed.). (2018). Designing and creating a culture of care for students and faculty: The Chamberlain University College of Nursing Model. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.
McCance, T. McCormack, B., & Dewing, J. (2011). An exploration of person-centeredness in practice. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(2). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man01
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Purpose
Within the profession of nursing, multiple theories, models, and conceptual frameworks have been created to serve as a foundation for practice. The purpose of this assignment is to appraise the value of the model in serving as a theoretical framework and apply the model to your selected area of future professional nursing practice (your MSN track). For this assignment, you will select one of the following nursing models to address within the paper: the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model.
Course Outcomes
Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:
Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings. (CO #2)
Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (CO#4)
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment
Total Points Possible
This assessment is worth 175 points.
Due Date
Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Requirements
Criteria for Content
Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centred Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model).
In a three- to four-page scholarly paper, address the following:
Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discuss how the selected model addresses the four concepts within the nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment).
Discuss how the selected model qualifies as a theoretical framework within the profession of nursing, and its use within the profession.
Describe how the chosen model can be applied in the future APN role (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).
Preparing the paper
Submission Requirements
Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.
Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at least three and no more than four pages in length.
A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature sources must be used.
Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated.
Best Practices in Preparing the Project
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
Review directions thoroughly.
Follow submission requirements.
Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature references must be used.
Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.
Participation: RN-to-BSN
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
1. Attendance
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
- Integrate professional resources
- Engage in meaningful and respectful dialogue with classmates
- Express thoughts clearly and logically
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of two (2) times in each graded thread. These two (2) posts must be on two (2) separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Participation points: If your posts do not meet the participation requirements (above) 20% points will be deducted from a thread. Each thread is graded independently. You will receive a 20% point deduction in each thread if:
- your first post in each thread is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday, OR
- you do not post a second time in each thread
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. These two posts must be on 2 separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. mountain time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
| Discussion Criteria | A (92-100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B (84-91%) Very good or high level of performance |
C (76-83%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
F (0-75%) Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responds to the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week based on assigned reading(s) and weekly course lesson. 32% points | Thoroughly answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts. | Answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts. | Answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts. | Does not respond to the initial discussion question(s). Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of weekly concepts. |
| Supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources from assigned reading and/or textbook, and lesson. 24% points | Thoroughly supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that include lesson and assigned readings and may also include professional journal articles. Ideas are credited* to the source. | Supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that include lesson or assigned readings that are credited* to the source. | Satisfactorily supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that mention the lesson or assigned readings but source is not noted. | Little or no support of ideas and opinions with any experiences or resources. |
| Engages in meaningful and respectful dialogue with classmates before the end of the week. 28% points | Responds to classmates and/or instructor by name in a respectful manner speaking to the points already made by others, furthering the dialogue through clarification and additional knowledge, thereby contributing much depth to the discussion. | Usually responds to classmates and/or instructor by name and always in a respectful manner speaking to the points already made by others, furthering the dialogue and adds some depth to the discussion. | Unable to determine to whom the person is speaking but is respectful speaking to the points already made by others, but does not further the discussion. | Responds to classmates and/or instructor in a disrespectful manner or responses are not on topic causing distraction to the discussion. |
| Communicates in a professional manner. 16% points | Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (uses accurate English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation with minimal errors). | Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). | Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (many errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). | Presents information that is not clear, logical, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). |
| Participation Posts a minimum of two (2) times in each graded thread. These two (2) posts must be on two (2) separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 pm MT on Wednesday. 20% of points are deducted per thread if this criterion is not met. A zero is the lowest score possible per thread and each thread is graded independently. | NO points added or deducted if minimum requirements are met. | Deduct 20% of points if minimum requirements are NOT met. | ||
| *Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Example: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…. Smith (2010) claimed that….. Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. | ||||