NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System

NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System

NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System

Mar 14-20, 2022

Max Points:213

Objectives:

1. Discuss the influence of the IOM Report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” on the nursing profession.
2. Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions in advancing the goals of IOM Report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” for nursing.
3. Explain how nursing advocates overcome barriers to advancement.

Assessments

Published

Assessment Description

Take a moment to explore your new classroom and introduce yourself to your fellow classmates. What are you excited about learning? What do you think will be most challenging?

The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health
Read “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” located on the National Academies of
Sciences Engineering Medicine website, as needed to complete your assignment.
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12956/the-future-of-nursing-leading-change-advancing-health
Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition
Explore the Campaign for Action website.

State Action Coalitions

The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations
Read “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations,” located on the
National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine website.
https://www.nap.edu/read/12956/chapter/2

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System

NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System

Interprofessional collaboration is a process involving jointly advantageous active participation
between independent professionals in which each member of the health care team has knowledge
and skills that underwrite to the care provided and their relationships are governed by negotiated
shared norms and visions (Melkamu et al., 2020). Teamwork and collaboration are competencies
expected of healthcare professionals and refer to functioning effectively within nursing and
interprofessional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision
making to achieve quality patient care (Masters, 2017). Collaboration requires communication
among team members involved where every professional take part of their clinical expertise, that
is within their scope of practice. Interdisciplinary team conference can be considered
interprofessional collaboration. The more eyes laid on the patient, the more chances of reducing, if
not eliminate errors. All members of the interprofessional healthcare team must combine their
skills knowledge, and resources to improve outcomes, and nurses and physicians must modify
their traditional roles and work more collaboratively as colleagues (Masters, 2017).
The trend that is being helpful nowadays is the emergence of electronic medical record (EMR).
With paperless charting, communication is now accessible electronically. A good example is the
platform (data software) used by big healthcare systems such as Ascension (formerly Amita) and
Duly Health (formerly Dupage Medical Group) in Illinois. These two systems can now view each
other’s chartings provided the patient consented on merging data. This makes it easier for medical
providers provide continuity of care without waiting for fax or hard copy of diagnostics or lab
results as well as progress notes.
Eneyew Melkamu, Solomon Woldemariam, & Abera Haftu. (2020). Inter-professional collaboration
of nurses and midwives with physicians and associated factors in Jimma University specialized
teaching hospital, Jimma, south West Ethiopia, 2019: cross sectional study. BMC Nursing, 19(1),
1–9. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00426-w

Masters, K., (2017). Role development in professional nursing. Jones and Bartlett Learning
 GP
Gregory Pryor
replied toJoseph Lagman
Aug 4, 2022, 9:10 AM

Read

Replies to Joseph Lagman

Hello Joseph,
I agree with your post. What healthcare professionals must first realize is that each profession
has an area of expertise and respect of the specialty is of the utmost importance. There or
medical issues, nursing issues, and pharmaceutical issues. Collaboration of the professions
allows the team to come together and resolve issues. Take for example a medication issue. It
could lie within how the medication was transcribed by the physician, or how the medication is
being administered by the nurse, or the preparation and delivery of  the medication to the
nursing unit(Irajpour et al.,2019). I can recall when medications were coming to the nursing h if
and needed to be reconstituted at the time of delivery. Some nurses were not reconstituting
the medication because they missed the inservice and was failing to deliver the dose. With the
next dose due the nurse would discover the bag of medicine not reconstituted. Discovery of a
medication that could cause great harm to a patient, especially if the following nurse did not
follow up on the missing dose. The third problem lie in that the reconstituted medication was
not dissolved in the amount of fluid the order was written. If all three professions were
collaborating together the medication issue could have been avoided or discovered before the
patient condition deteriorated to sepsis.

Reference
Irajpour, A., Farzi, S., Saghaei, M., & Ravaghi, H. (2019). Effect of interprofessional education
of medication safety program on the medication error of physicians and nurses in the intensive
care units. Journal of Education and Health Promotion.

Excellent

Point range: 90–100

 

Good

Point range: 80–89

 

Fair

Point range: 70–79

 

Poor

Point range: 0–69

 

Introduction to the case (1

page)

Briefly explain and summarize

the case for this Assignment.

Be sure to include the specific

patient factors that may impact

your decision making when

prescribing medication for this

patient.

 

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

The response accurately, clearly,

and fully summarizes in detail the

case for the Assignment.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

specific patient factors that

impact decision making when

prescribing medication for this

patient.

 

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

The response accurately

summarizes the case for the

Assignment.

The response accurately explains

the specific patient factors that

impact decision making with

prescribing medication for this

patient.

 

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

The response inaccurately or

vaguely summarizes the case for

the Assignment.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the specific

patient factors that impact

decision making with prescribing

medication for this patient.

 

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

The response inaccurately and

vaguely summarizes the case for

the Assignment, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains the specific

patient factors that impact

decision making with prescribing

medication for this patient.

 

Decision #1 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you

select?

• Why did you select this

decision? Be specific and

support your response with

clinically relevant and patient-

specific resources, including

the primary literature.

• Why did you not select the

 

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

decision selected.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that fully support the

decision selected.

 

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately explains

the decision selected.

The response explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that support the

decision selected.

The response accurately explains

 

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the decision

selected.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the decision

 

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains the decision

selected.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

decision selected, or is missing.

 

other two options provided in

the exercise? Be specific and

support your response with

clinically relevant and patient-

specific resources, including

the primary literature.

• What were you hoping to

achieve by making this

decision? Support your

response with evidence and

references to the Learning

Resources (including the

primary literature).

• Explain how ethical

considerations may impact

your treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Be specific and provide

examples.

 

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail why the

other two responses were not

selected, with specific clinically

relevant resources that fully

support the response.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

outcome the student was hoping

to achieve with the selected

decision, with specific clinically

relevant resources that fully

support the response.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail how

ethical considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided fully support

the decisions and responses

provided.

 

why the other two responses

were not selected, with specific

clinically relevant resources that

support the response.

The response accurately explains

the outcome the student was

hoping to achieve with the

selected decision, with specific

clinically relevant resources that

support the response.

The response accurately explains

how ethical considerations

impact the treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided support the

decisions and responses

provided.

 

selected.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the other

two responses were not selected,

with specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the response.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the outcome the

student was hoping to achieve

with the selected decision, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the response.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided may support

the decisions and responses

provided.

 

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the other

two responses were not selected,

with specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

decision selected, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains the outcome the

student was hoping to achieve

with the selected decision, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

response, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients, or

is missing.

Examples provided do not

support the decisions and

responses provided, or is

missing.

 

Decision #2 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you

select?

• Why did you select this

decision? Be specific and

support your response with

clinically relevant and patient-

specific resources, including

the primary literature.

• Why did you not select the

other two options provided in

the exercise? Be specific and

support your response with

clinically relevant and patient-

specific resources, including

the primary literature.

• What were you hoping to

 

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

decision selected.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that fully support the

decision selected.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail why the

other two responses were not

selected, with specific clinically

relevant resources that fully

support the response.

 

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately explains

the decision selected.

The response explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that support the

decision selected.

The response accurately explains

why the other two responses

were not selected, with specific

clinically relevant resources that

support the response.

The response accurately explains

the outcome the student was

 

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the decision

selected.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the decision

selected.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the other

two responses were not selected,

with specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

 

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains in detail the

decision selected.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

decision selected, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the other

two responses were not selected,

with specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

decision selected, or is missing.

 

achieve by making this

decision? Support your

response with evidence and

references to the Learning

Resources (including the

primary literature).

• Explain how ethical

considerations may impact

your treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Be specific and provide

examples.

 

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

outcome the student was hoping

to achieve with the selected

decision, with specific clinically

relevant resources that fully

support the response.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail how

ethical considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided fully support

the decisions and responses

provided.

 

hoping to achieve with the

selected decision, with specific

clinically relevant resources that

support the response.

The response accurately explains

how ethical considerations

impact the treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided support the

decisions and responses

provided.

 

vaguely support the response.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the outcome the

student was hoping to achieve

with the selected decision, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the response.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided may support

the decisions and responses

provided.

 

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains the outcome the

student was hoping to achieve

with the selected decision, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

response, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients, or

is missing.

Examples provided do not

support the decisions and

responses provided, or is

missing.

 

Decision #3 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you

select?

• Why did you select this

decision? Be specific and

support your response with

clinically relevant and patient-

specific resources, including

the primary literature.

• Why did you not select the

other two options provided in

the exercise? Be specific and

support your response with

clinically relevant and patient-

specific resources, including

the primary literature.

• What were you hoping to

achieve by making this

decision? Support your

response with evidence and

references to the Learning

Resources (including the

primary literature).

• Explain how ethical

 

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

decision selected.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that fully support the

decision selected.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail why the

other two responses were not

selected, with specific clinically

relevant resources that fully

support the response.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail the

outcome the student was hoping

to achieve with the selected

decision, with specific clinically

relevant resources that fully

 

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately explains

the decision selected.

The response explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that support the

decision selected.

The response accurately explains

why the other two responses

were not selected, with specific

clinically relevant resources that

support the response.

The response accurately explains

the outcome the student was

hoping to achieve with the

selected decision, with specific

clinically relevant resources that

support the response.

The response accurately explains

how ethical considerations

 

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the decision

selected.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the decision

selected.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the other

two responses were not selected,

with specific clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the response.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the outcome the

student was hoping to achieve

with the selected decision, with

specific clinically relevant

 

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains in detail the

decision selected.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the

decision was selected, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

decision selected, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the other

two responses were not selected,

with specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

decision selected, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains the outcome the

student was hoping to achieve

with the selected decision, with

specific clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

 

considerations may impact

your treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Be specific and provide

examples.

 

support the response.

The response accurately and

clearly explains in detail how

ethical considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided fully support

the decisions and responses

provided.

 

impact the treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided support the

decisions and responses

provided.

 

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the response.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients.

Examples provided may support

the decisions and responses

provided.

 

response, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the

treatment plan and

communication with patients, or

is missing.

Examples provided do not

support the decisions and

responses provided, or is

missing.

 

Conclusion (1 page)

• Summarize your

recommendations on the

treatment options you selected

for this patient. Be sure to

justify your recommendations

and support your response

with clinically relevant and

patient-specific resources,

including the primary literature.

 

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response accurately and

clearly summarizes in detail the

recommendations on the

treatment options selected for

this patient.

The response accurately and

clearly explains a justification for

the recommendations provided,

including clinically relevant

resources that fully support the

recommendations provided.

 

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The response accurately

summarizes the

recommendations on the

treatment options selected for

this patient.

The response accurately explains

a justification for the

recommendation provided,

including clinically relevant

resources that support the

recommendations provided.

 

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

The response inaccurately or

vaguely summarizes the

recommendations on the

treatment options selected for

this patient.

The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains a justification for

the recommendations provided,

including clinically relevant

resources that inaccurately or

vaguely support the

recommendations provided.

 

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

The response inaccurately and

vaguely summarizes the

recommendations on the

treatment options selected for

this patient, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains a justification for

the recommendations provided,

including clinically relevant

resources that do not support the

recommendations provided, or is

missing.

 

Written Expression and

Formatting – Paragraph

Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points

that support well-developed

ideas, flow logically, and

demonstrate continuity of

ideas. Sentences are carefully

focused—neither long and

rambling nor short and lacking

substance. A clear and

comprehensive purpose

statement and introduction are

provided that delineate all

required criteria.

 

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,

continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive

purpose statement, introduction,

and conclusion are provided that

delineate all required criteria.

 

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,

continuity, and clarity 80% of the

time.

Purpose, introduction, and

conclusion of the assignment are

stated, yet they are brief and not

descriptive.

 

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,

continuity, and clarity 60%–79%

of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and

conclusion of the assignment is

vague or off topic.

 

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,

continuity, and clarity < 60% of

the time.

No purpose statement,

introduction, or conclusion were

provided.

NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System

Written Expression and

Formatting – English writing

standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics,

and proper punctuation

 

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling,

and punctuation with no errors.

 

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,

spelling, and punctuat