NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Implementing any change in a healthcare organization or facility entails several aspects that require one to develop an implementation as is the most important part of any evidence-based practice (EBP) project proposal. Implementation entails the actualization of the ideas developed in the proposal EBP projects are broken into several identifiable steps (Boehm et al., 2020). The implementation plan will focus on hand hygiene measures in pediatric setting among healthcare workers to reduce hospital acquired infections (HAIs). The implementation plan will consist of the setting where the project will take place, time, resources, methods and instruments, intervention of delivery process, and data collection plan. The plan also includes management of barriers, facilitators and challenges and the feasibility of the plan.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects
The implementation framework of any EBP project includes establishment of a motive for change, development of specific goals, attaining leadership support, creating a leadership teams and engagement of clinical support. In this case, the project setting will be a pediatric hospital where nurse practitioners and clinical nurse leaders involved in service delivery to the patient population will be the main subjects taking part in the proposed project. The selected participants should have served in this unit for the last 12 months. The project will select 20 healthcare staff to be involved in the implementation process.
The second component of this project is getting consent or approval from the participants and the institutional review board for the project to take place. Participants’ consent will be essential as it will demonstrate their willingness to be part of the project without any undue influence. The review board will give the project a green light and ensure that ethical provisions are met to protect the subjects. The consent will indicate that the main purpose of the project is to reduce the rate of HAI within six months by enhancing hand hygiene measures, specifically the use of alcohol-hand sanitizers or rubs alongside handwashing using soap and water. The participants will sign the consent form upon getting relevant information about the project and its overall benefits to the population.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Timelines
The implementation timeframe for the EBP project will be six months. Different activities will take place each month to ensure that all components of the proposal are implemented effectively. The timeframe will include creation of a multidisciplinary team in the first two weeks of the program. The last two weeks of the first month will have collection of required resources and expertise for the implementation process. The training of the nursing staff will occur in the second month and will take two to three weeks to ascertain that the participants have sufficient knowledge and skills based on existing resource to implement hand hygiene measures aimed at reducing HAIs.
The first week of the third month will involve identification of any possible barriers that may influence or interfere with the implementation. The duration will also be used to increase stakeholder engagement, participation and collection of their input and views to be incorporated in the final implementation activities (Luciano et al., 2019). The remain three and half months will involve the actual implementation. However, in the fifth month, the project team will review the implementation to ascertain if there will be need to have any modifications to the project. The implication is that the implementation process will be successful if the five months will be used as expected in the timelines proposed for the plan.
Resources
Studies show that success of any evidence-based project primarily rely on the availability of the needed resources (DeNisco, 2019; Luciano et al., 2019). The implementation of this project require human resources that will comprise of competent trainers who will impart the project team with necessary knowledge and skills. The most appropriate resource for this EBP project include nurse practitioners and clinical nurse leaders. Engagement of nurse practitioners and clinical nurse leaders with the requisite skills improves the success of quality improvement projects. In addition to the human resources, the project will also require financial resources to fund the implementation. the financial resources will be deployed to compensate the trainers and buy required stationeries like the training manuals. These resources will also be instrumental in overall implementation as they will be used to buy equipment like hand-rubs for demonstration. The resources will also include travel expenses for the project manager and the team. Changes needed in the implementation of the solution will include more education and awareness among caregivers since most of the pediatric patients may not comprehend the protocols that will be proposed to reduce hospital acquired infections.
Qualitative or Quantitative Design in Data Collection and Effectiveness
The selected design to collect data for the evidence-based practice project proposal is qualitative. The qualitative approach is deployed to understand thoughts, concepts, and experiences of participants through techniques like interviews, focus groups, observations, and a review of existing literature (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). The qualitative research design will be effective in the project proposal since it will entail getting opinions through deployment of different methods from healthcare workers about the need to enhance hand hygiene measures to prevent and reduce the occurrence of hospital acquired infections, especially in pediatric settings (Vandermause et al., 2017). The evidence-based practice project proposal on hand hygiene measures among healthcare workers to reduce and prevent hospital acquired infections (HAIs) in pediatric settings will inform stakeholders about the importance of handwashing protocols. The EBP project proposal is effective as it will ensure that healthcare workers in the selected settings adhere to hand hygiene measures for effective care delivery and minimize the prevalence of infections that negatively impact patient outcomes and quality care delivery.
Methods and Instruments for Monitoring
The implementation process will entail various methods and instruments in its monitoring. Firstly, an audit tool and satisfaction survey will be used in the implementation process. The project team will use satisfaction survey to evaluate the effectiveness of the measures executed to decrease high prevalence of hospital acquired infections in the pediatric unit. The audit framework will be deployed to complete the auditing process. The tool will enhance the auditing of gathered data on specific hand hygiene interventions and their outcomes (Vandermause et al., 2017). Additionally, the project will use questionnaires to collect the required data from the participating nurse. questionnaires are effective data collection tools and nurse leaders and practitioners will fill them out to offer information about the effectiveness of hand hygiene measures that can reduce occurrence of HAIs in pediatric patient population. The information will guide the project implementation team during the process for effective outcomes. The auditing tools and satisfaction surveys alongside the questionnaire use will be critical in attaining the expected project goals.
Delivery of the Intervention
The delivery process for the intervention will involve project team members that comprise of nurse leaders and practitioners. The nurses and practitioners will develop and execute necessary protocols like setting hand sanitizer stations at different points of the care delivery process (Luciano et al., 2019). These points will include the nursing stations and having points in pediatric wards as well as other key points to enhance hand hygiene measures. The participants will require training to enable them perform their respective duties well. Training will consist of giving information to nurse leaders about the components of the proposed so that they can effectively supervise the nurse practitioners to ensure that they carry out their mandate as expected. The practitioners will also require training to implement the proposed measures as planned to meet the set project goals.
Stakeholders Required to Implement the Plan
Stakeholder support is a critical component of evidence –based practice project proposal as they provide critical resources, input, and implement the recommendations of such programs. In this case, several stakeholders will be needed to implement the project (DeNisco, 2019). The initial stakeholders will include clinical nurse leaders and practitioners who will ensure that the components of EBP project are realized. The second set of stakeholders include the project team and trainers that shall offer direction on the implementation of the EBP intervention. The third stakeholder group needed comprise of organizational leaders and managers who shall provide the requisite resources; especially financial resources, to implement the proposed plan to reduce hospital acquired infections in the target population.
Aspects of the Implementation Plan and Potential barriers, Challenges and Proposed Strategies
The success of the project will depend on how the project team manage different aspects like facilitators, barriers, and develop effective strategies to respond adequately. For instance, organizational leaders and managers will be critical facilitators as they offer necessary support through resource allocation and a buy-in. The management will also support the new project will the aim of improving overall care quality.
Time and resource limitation, insufficient knowledge and skills among healthcare workers would be significant barriers in implementation of the project. Negative attitudes that will fuel resistance will also hamper effective implementation of the project as many will feel that it will be sufficient to assess the overall effectiveness of the intervention (Vandermause et al., 2017). It is essential to mitigate these barriers through effective strategies like sticking to the timeframe for implementation, engaging all stakeholders like leaders and managers, and enhancing communication among all players.
Feasibility
The feasibility of this project will be assessed based on a cost-benefit analysis approach. The cost incurred in the implementation process will be estimated to assess the overall benefits that will accrue to patients and healthcare organization’s unit (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). The cost will also include funds to compensate trainers and buy the needed project implementation materials to evaluate the overall feasibility of the plan. the unit should implement the plan since its cost-benefit analysis will be positive to the organization.
Conclusion
The implementation of the project stage is essential as it consists of the real practical application of expected changes and subsequent outcomes. Therefore, it is important to evaluate all aspects of the stage for effective outcomes and project’s sustainability. The highlighted plan will be effective through increased stakeholder engagement and participation.
NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation References
Boehm, L. M., Stolldorf, D. P., & Jeffery, A. D. (2020). Implementation science training and
resources for nurses and nurse scientists. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(1), 47-54. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12510.
DeNisco, S. M. (2019). Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession:
Essential Knowledge for the Profession. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Klingbeil, C. & Gibson, C. (2018). The Teach Back Project: A System-wide Evidence Based
Practice Implementation. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 42:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.06.002.
Luciano, M. M., Aloia, T. A. & Brett, J. F. (2019). 4 Ways to Make Evidence-Based Practice the
Norm in Health Care. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/08/4-ways-to-make-evidence-based-practice-the-norm-in-health-care
Rebekah, G., & Ravindran, V. (2018). Statistical analysis in nursing research. Indian Journal of
Continuing Nursing Education, 19(1), 62.
Vandermause, R., Barg, F. K., Esmail, L., Edmundson, L., Girard, S., & Perfetti, A. R. (2017).
Qualitative methods in patient-centered outcomes research. Qualitative health research, 27(3), 434-442. doi: 10.1177/1049732316668298
Week 8 Assignment
Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Develop a 10-15-slide presentation with comprehensive speaker’s notes that covers all of the major areas of your evidence-based practice proposal.
You will need to post a rough draft of your evidence-based practice presentation to the Main Forum in Topic 8 DQ 1 for peer feedback.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references compiled from the final project should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Resources
Collapse All
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapters 22 and 23 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
View Resource
Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference
Read “Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference,” by Douglas, Jackson, Woods,
… Read More
Loom
Loom is a free video recording tool that allows you send messages through shareable videos. For assistance on installing the softwa
… Read More
https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/115015942807-Third-Party-Contact-Information
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
View Resource
Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation
Read “Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation,” by Bodin and McDaniel, from Alabama Nurse (2019).
Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities
Read “Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities,” by
Cunningham-
… Read More
Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Read “Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge,” by Sawaya, from International Journal of Chi
… Read More
Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory
Read “Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory,” by Ligita, Francis, Wicking, Harvey, and Nurjannah, fro
… Read More
Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects
Read “Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects,” by Siedleck
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login
NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation – Rubric
Collapse All
Introduction
6 points
Criteria Description
Introduction
- 5: Excellent
6 points
The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
- 4: Good
5.52 points
The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed.
- 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An introduction is not included.
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
12 points
Criteria Description
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization.
Problem Statement and Literature Review
18 points
Criteria Description
Problem Statement and Literature Review
- 5: Excellent
18 points
The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout.
- 4: Good
16.56 points
The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall.
- 3: Satisfactory
15.84 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.
Change Model or Framework
12 points
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan
12 points
Criteria Description
Implementation Plan
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The implementation plan is not described.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is only partially described.
Evaluation Plan
12 points
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Conclusion
6 points
Criteria Description
Conclusion
- 5: Excellent
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way.
- 4: Good
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.
- 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A conclusion is not presented.