NURS 8000 Assignment: Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8000 Assignment: Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

The purpose of a DNP scholarly project is to translate evidence-based research into nursing practice. DNP students have the ability to adopt the scholarly project for purposes of proving their leadership mettle as well as practice competence at the apex of clinical nursing practice (Hande & Phillippi, 2018). My DNP project will focus on geriatrics. I would be interested in a project on a nurse-led Dementia prevention program for community-dwelling older adults.

The first step in the DNP project will be to identify a practice problem and a practice gap, identify a chair, and select the approach and DNP practicum manual type. The second step will be to develop a prospectus and upload it for review by the committee and approval by the program’s director (Walden University, 2018).  After approval, I will work on the proposal’s sections 1-3 and regularly submit it to the faculty for feedback. After that, I will present the proposal to my chair for approval and upload the proposal to the Preliminary committee for Rubric Analysis and the committee Rubric analysis for a formal review.

IRB application for form A will begin after committee approval and submission of the proposal to URR. The next step will be an oral presentation, which I will conduct using a PowerPoint presentation (Walden University, 2018). Afterward, I will complete the subsequent steps in line with my proposal and the approved IRB, including data collection as per the project. Upon completing the DNP project, I will upload it to the preliminary section in MYDR chair and then to the committee on Rubric Analysis.

In year one of the DNP program, I will develop the prospectus and complete sections 1 and 2 of the proposal. In year two, I will complete section 3, meet with the committee, complete IRB approval, and defend the project proposal. In the final year, I will collect data and complete the final project scholarly manuscript. I will also defend the final project, work on revisions on the final manuscript, and submit the final project’s document to the Knowledge Bank with permission from the chair.

The documents that I will use for the DNP scholarly project include the DNP practicum manual, DNP Project Process Guide, DNP Minimum Standards Rubric, DNP Prospectus rubric and guide, as well as DNP Final Quality Rubric. With regard to oral presentations, I am going to employ the usage of the Final Defense PowerPoint Template  as well as the DNP Proposal Defense PowerPoint Template.

References

Hande, K., & Phillippi, J. C. (2018). DNP Project Timeline Template: A Guide for Successful Completion. Nurse educator, 43(3), 115–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000472

Walden University. (2018, May). Academic guides: Capstone documents: DNP doctoral project. Welcome – Walden University Departments & Centers – Academic Guides at Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/program-documents/dnp

As a doctoral candidate, you will complete either a DNP Scholarly Project or a PhD Dissertation. Are you curious about what will be required of you? For this Assignment, you locate and read materials that pertain to your doctoral program at Walden University, and begin thinking about your DNP Scholarly Project or PhD Dissertation.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8000 Assignment: Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

To prepare:

DNP students:

• Review the DNP section of the Walden University website (http://researchcenter.waldenu.edu/DNP-Doctoral-Study-Program.htm.
• Carefully review the requirements for the DNP Scholarly Project process.
• Consider the steps and timeline you will work through to complete the DNP Scholarly project.

PhD students:

• Review the information presented at the Walden University Writing Center PhD Dissertation website (http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/549.htm).
• Carefully review the requirements for the Premise, Prospectus, and Dissertation process.
• Consider the steps you will work through to complete the Premise, Prospectus, and Dissertation process and the timeline for completing each step.

To complete:

Write a 1-page paper outlining the steps, timeline for completing the project / dissertation, and the documents you will use for either the DNP Scholarly Project or the PhD Dissertation. Include the main guide document that identifies the processes and procedures for the appropriate doctoral project.

DNP students:

• Summarize the purpose of the DNP Scholarly Project.
• Briefly describe a project that would be of interest to you and how you might go about completing that project.

Due by Day 7 of Week 5.

Week in Review

This week, you evaluated professional opportunities for intra- and interdisciplinary collaborative practice available to nurses with a doctoral degree.

Next week, you will explore the various resources provided by Walden University to assist you in becoming a critical and scholarly reader, thinker, and writer.

The Assignment that you began working on in Week 3 is due by Day 7 of this week.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

Read Also: NURS 8000 Week 5 Discussion: Ethics

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8000 Assignment: Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5

To submit your Assignment:

Week 5 Assignment

Week Three Initial Post

The healthcare system provides care to “diverse populations across the lifespan,” and nurses are at the forefront of this work, from a new graduate to an advanced practice nurse (Institute of Medicine [IOM], 2010a, p. 4). There are over “3 million members” of the nursing profession, which constitutes a large professional percentage of the healthcare workforce (IOM, 2010b).

The nursing profession should be practicing to the full extent of their role, and higher levels of education should be supported and obtained in a seamless manner (IOM, 2010a). The purpose of this discussion is to explore advanced practice nursing roles, in this case, the Ph.D., and relate them to intra and interprofessional collaboration. Along with this topic, two examples will be shared to support the notion of collaboration from both the intra and inter-professional perspectives.

Intra-Professional Collaboration

The Canadian Nurses Association [CNA] determines that intra-professional collaboration is defined as a “respectful process, among nursing colleagues that allow for effective use of the knowledge, skills, and talents of all nursing designations…. to achieve optimal health system outcomes”. The ability to support intra- professional collaboration requires that there must be policies in place at the organizational level, a framework for decision-making that is evidence-based, and the addition of education strategies in nursing schools to foster these behaviors (CNA, 2020).

There are various places that nurses are employed with varying levels of experience and education, such as nurse educators, administrators, public health, entrepreneurism, and many more (Zacagnini & Pechacek, 2021).

The PhD-educated nurse is a research-based role that can interact with practicing nurses’ various levels and education. Lacking in some roles is the need for clinical research and leadership hybrid (Currey et al., 2011). Currey et al. (2011) state that many nurses do not use the evidence available to make quality patient care decisions. The clinical research nurse consultant (CRNC) can assist in collaborating intra-professionally with all nursing roles to promote change management and encourage the use of current evidence.

Interprofessional Collaboration

Inter-Professional collaboration is defined as health workers from multiple backgrounds provide seamless services to offer the “highest quality of care across settings” (CNA, n.d.). The key goals for collaborating professions are providing patient-centered care, evidence-informed decisions, improving access, and contributing to epidemiology (CNA, n.d.). At the interpersonal collaboration, table advanced practice nursing at the DNP or Ph.D. level brings credibility to the table to collaborate effectively across professions (Laureate Education, 2011d).

The key to collaborating is understanding other professions’ perspectives and articulating the nursing perspective (Laureate Education, 2011d). The IOM states that nursing should be partners with physicians, allowing the nursing profession to advance health care efforts to be more efficient (2010b). Nursing education programs need to include education concepts related to working with interprofessional teams and a culture within organizations that promotes collaboration (2010b).

Nursing informatics roles provide a clear example of the necessity of interprofessional collaboration. When exploring meaningful use for a technology system, all professionals’ perspectives using the electronic medical record (EMR) are crucial. The nurse informaticist “integrates nursing science to manage and communicate data knowledge and wisdom in nursing practice” (Zaccagnini & Pechacek, 2010, p. 342).

The nurse informatics chief’s role can be effective as systems are utilized for meaningful use within health care organizations (Zaccagnini & Pechacek, 2010). The advanced practice nurse would be required to have the skills to collaborate interprofessionally to meet these common goals related to the EMR.                 

Conclusion

The aim of the discussion this week was to explore the role of advanced practice nursing in the Ph.D. role in terms of Intra and interprofessional collaboration. Examples were provided for each role to illustrate the value of each form of collaboration.

References

Canadian Nurses Association (CNA). (2020). [Position Statement]. Intra-Professional Collaboration. Retrieved from https://www.cna-aiic.ca/en

Canadian Nurses Association (CNA). (n.d.) Interprofessional Collaboration. Retrieved from https://www.cna-aiic.ca/en

Currey, J., Considine, J., & Khaw, D. (2011). Clinical nurse research consultant: A clinical and academic role to advance practice and the discipline of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(10), 2275-2283. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05687.x

Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2010a). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health[Consensus report]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150211165201/http://iom.edu/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health.aspx

Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2010b). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health

[Report brief]. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150203150734/http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing/Future%20of%20Nursing%202010%20Report%20Brief.pdf

Laureate Education (Producer). (2011d). The professional role of the DNP-prepared nurse [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

Zaccagnini, M. & Pechacek, J. M. (2021). The doctor of nursing practice essentials: A new model for advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).  Jones & Bartlett.

NURS_8000_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

		Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION Discussion post minimum requirements: *The original posting must be completed by Wednesday, Day 3, at 11:59pm MST. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Saturday, Day 6, at 11:59pm MST. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the minimum number of posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources as well as resources available through the Walden University online databases. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct.		Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%) Discussion postings and responses exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: Respond to the question being asked or the prompt provided; – Go beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated); -Are substantive, reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. – Demonstrate significant ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning -Resources as well as additional resources and has read, viewed, or considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings; -Exceed the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.	Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%) Discussion postings and responses meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: -Respond to the question being asked or the prompt provided; -Are substantive, reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence.re -Demonstrate ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources and has read, viewed, or considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings -Meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.	Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%) Discussion postings and responses are minimally responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: – do not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question or prompt; and/or -May (lack) lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and/or -Do not adequately demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning -Resources and/or a sampling of colleagues’ postings; and/or has posted by the due date at least in part. – Lack ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Do not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%) Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: – do not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question or prompt; and/or – Lack in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. – Lack ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Do not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources and/or a sampling of colleagues’ postings; and/or does not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE		Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%) Discussion postings and responses: -demonstrate in-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations including analysis, synthesis and/or evaluation of topic; – are well supported by pertinent research/evidence from a variety of and multiple peer- reviewed books and journals, where appropriate; -Demonstrate significant mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of content, applicable skills or strategies presented in the course.	Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%) Discussion postings and responses: -demonstrate understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course, presented with some understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations including analysis, synthesis and/or evaluation of topic; -are supported by research/evidence from peer-reviewed books and journals, where appropriate; and · demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course.	Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%) Discussion postings and responses: – demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors; –lack support by research/evidence and/or the research/evidence is inappropriate or marginal in quality; and/or lack of analysis, synthesis or evaluation of topic – demonstrate minimal content, skills or strategies presented in the course. ——-Contain numerous errors when using the skills or strategies presented in the course	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%) Discussion postings and responses demonstrate: -A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course; and/or are inaccurate, contain many omissions and/or errors; and/or are not supported by research/evidence; and/or lack of analysis, synthesis or evaluation of topic -Many critical errors when discussing content, applicable skills or strategies presented in the course.
CONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION		Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%) Discussion postings and responses significantly contribute to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning by: -providing Rich and relevant examples; discerning and thought-provoking ideas; and stimulating thoughts and probes; – -demonstrating original thinking, new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of ideas supported by the literature.	Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%) Discussion postings and responses contribute to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning by -providing relevant examples; thought-provoking ideas – Demonstrating synthesis of ideas supported by the literature	Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%) Discussion postings and responses minimally contribute to the quality of discussion/interaction and thinking and learning by: – providing few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or – providing few if any thought- provoking ideas; and/or -. Information that is restated from the literature with no/little demonstration of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%) Discussion postings and responses do not contribute to the quality of interaction/discussion and thinking and learning as they do not: -Provide examples (or examples are irrelevant); and/or -Include interesting thoughts or ideas; and/or – Demonstrate of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas
QUALITY OF WRITING		Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%) Discussion postings and responses exceed doctoral -level writing expectations. They: · Use grammar and syntax that is clear, concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing; · Make few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; · Use original language and refrain from directly quoting original source materials; -provide correct APA · Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.	Points Range: 5 (16.67%) – 5 (16.67%) Discussion postings and responses meet doctoral -level writing expectations. They: ·Use grammar and syntax that is clear and appropriate to doctoral level writing; ; · Make a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; · paraphrase but refrain from directly quoting original source materials; Provide correct APA format · Are courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints;.	Points Range: 4 (13.33%) – 4 (13.33%) Discussion postings and responses are minimally below doctoral-level writing expectations. They: · Make more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; · Directly quote from original source materials and/or paraphrase rather than use original language; lack correct APA format; and/or · Are less than courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (10%) Discussion postings and responses are well below doctoral -level writing expectations. They: · Use grammar and syntax that is that is unclear · Make many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and –use incorrect APA format · Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.
Total Points: 30

Name: NURS_8000_Week1_Discussion_Rubric