PM 3000 Principles of Project Management Unit 5 Discussion      

PM 3000 Principles of Project Management Unit 5 Discussion

DQ1 PM Code of Ethics and Professional Development Analysis

As professional project managers in today’s ever-changing and chaotic environment, we face numerous challenges for upholding the high standards of ethical behavior. We faced dilemmas involving issues such as bias, nepotism, and fraudulent activities. PMI has developed a set of conduct behaviors, including honesty, responsibility, respect, and fairness, to ensure long-term project success and project manager integrity (Project Management Institute, n.d.).

For this discussion:

View and evaluate the CapraTek: Ethics and Professional Conduct interactive (in the Resources) and select two of the violations.

For each violation, state:

The violation.

The “PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct” value the violation impacted.

Recommendations for mitigating the violation.

Discussion and Response Guidelines

Regarding discussions in this course, you are encouraged to initially post early in the unit for each discussion, to allow time for peers to respond. The expectation within the course discussions is to respond to at least two posts by the end of the unit, but it is highly recommended that you extend the dialog further. Responding over multiple days will help stimulate a lively discussion.

Reference

Project Management Institute. (n.d.).PMI code of ethics and professional conduct. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics/code

Resources

Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.

PMI code of ethics and professional conduct.

CapraTek: Ethics and Professional Conduct.

DQ2 Course Review and Reflection

Reflect on your learning in this course, considering how your professional communications have improved throughout the course.

Specifically, discuss at least two ideas that wer

presented in this course that you feel will help you, or that may have already helped you, in your career as a professional project manager.

Did this course provide you with enough exposure to PM methodologies, tools, techniques, and strategies for you to decide to pursue a career in PM?

Response Guidelines

You are not required to respond to the posts of other learners.

Learning Components

This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:  PM 3000 Principles of Project Management Unit 5 Discussion      

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐  The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

Check Out Also:  PM 3000 Unit 1- Discussion Project Management Standards and Project Management Methodologies