PRAC 6665 JOURNAL ENTRY

Rubric

PRAC_6665_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
PRAC_6665_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection

50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent
Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good
Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair
Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.

34 to >0 pts

Poor
Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments.
50 pts
Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent
Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good
Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair
Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor
Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.
30 pts
Written Expression and Formatting

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good
Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair
Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

10 to >0 pts

Poor
Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.
15 pts
APA

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Contains no APA errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains one to two (1–2) APA errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains three to five (3–5) APA errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains more than five (>5) APA errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

Similar Posts